ConnectWise RMM vs. Icinga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ConnectWise RMM
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
ConnectWise RMM is built upon the Asio platform and combines out-of-the-box automation coupled with robust automation that IT solution providers can use to deliver customized services to their customers. ConnectWise RMM aggregates both software and human elements, covers the spectrum of do-it-yourself (DIY) and do-it-for-you (DFY) delivery options, and integrates an intelligent automation engine. It’s a solution that reinvents how IT solution providers adopt, interact with and manage their…N/A
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Pricing
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Best Alternatives
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
Score 8.5 out of 10
Zabbix
Zabbix
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConnectWise RMMIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for environments with a large number of users (think MSPs) that need remote access, and quickly getting to a client site is either not an option, or will greatly increase delays in support. It also works well to monitor client devices and make decisions based on the robust reporting offered (hardware, installed OS version, OS Patching, etc.). It is not very well suited for small environments or single businesses due to cost, and management required.
Read full review
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
Pros
  • Grouping/Reporting: static organization as well as dynamically and quickly getting inventory and other machine-based information
  • Out-sourced teams do a good job of handling small things without much input as long as you are clear and concise.
  • Patching is likely the best thing about their platform. Windows patch testing is actually performed in house and they make recommendations for you. Allowing you to push through patches if you know someone needs something. But this is a major task that very few if anyone else does.
Read full review
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
Cons
  • It runs heavy on the resources of the computer.
  • Sometimes the Updates are a little behind.
  • The message tab open up in the background.
Read full review
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ScreenConnect and RMM are two totally different platforms We did not try any other competitive RMM software out their because of the history of using ConnectWise's software. We have never have had any issues with their software so we started using RMM right out of the box and never have had a reason to switch.
Read full review
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Command package from ConnectWise fits mostly with our objectives for our clients in a day to day operations.
  • BDR Package is a great platform to manage Disaster Recover options - Sometimes hard to understand the billing options and plans
  • NOC services for the servers are the best. Support is on top of the server for anything needed.
Read full review
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
ScreenShots