Coda by Grammarly vs. SAP Jam

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Coda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases.
$0
per month
SAP Jam
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
SAP Jam is a social network collaboration tool with integrated collaborative processes for knowledge, learning, and HR management. SAP Jam also includes capabilities for the entire sales, marketing, and customer service lifecycles.N/A
Pricing
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Editions & Modules
Free
$0.00
per month
Pro
$10.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Team
$30.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWith Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Features
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Search00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Chat00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Coda by Grammarly
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.0
Ratings
11% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Coda by GrammarlySAP Jam
Likelihood to Recommend
Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
Read full review
For doing the historical data analysis, sap is the most convenient way to capture and collect whole bulk data, which makes the analysis so easy and quick. Apart from this, it links all updated costs with each part so that the most updated cost for the purchased part would be used to calculate the system cost.
Read full review
Pros
  • One source of truth: It's incredibly easy to keep everything organized and easy to find.
  • Being able to show different views of the same information throughout your doc makes it really easy to customize the information.
  • In general, I love the "coding" aspect of it, and being able to do advanced functions has helped us create some really interesting automation and streamline our process.
Read full review
  • Inventory planning
  • Design data storage
  • Scheduling
  • Production planning
  • Material consumption
Read full review
Cons
  • "Barrier of entry" is a little high for those who do not have any database experience.
  • More out-of-the-box integrations with other applications would be nice.
  • Performance for very heavy loaded/traffic documents could be improved.
  • Scalability for enterprise level customers and doc loads could be improved.
Read full review
  • The main collaboration function is in the form of discussion forums. Asset-editing a la Office365 or Google Docs would be welcome.
  • JAM has a mobile app, but not all user-generated content is automatically adapted for mobile-view.
  • Users have some control over their notifications by group, but there is a missing level of control that would benefit from.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
Read full review
We are moving toward other platforms that are meant more for virtual community, like Higher Logic. The customer support at SAP Jam is also lacking.
Read full review
Usability
There is a little bit of a learning curve on where to point and click to add in different elements and make edits. But it is still very manageable once you get the hang of it. I do still have some issues with some of my connected pages updating each other when I don't want them to sync. So I'll end up editing one page, and it will make the same edits on another page.
Read full review
It's an integrated platform that brings together a lot of different people from across the association to work on shared projects, etc. Given the various roles people play and the varying skill sets they bring to the table, the platform is fairly intuitive to use and easy to navigate around
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
So far in the past year, we haven't had situations that Coda has gone down for us which is great.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
Read full review
We have to submit requests multiple times to get a response and it often feels like they go into a black hole. Because we don't have anyone in house really supporting the back-end of the platform, we rely on SAP Jam's support and development teams to help solve problems and improve the platform for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
For general use cases, Google Docs or Airtable are often a better starting place. But if things get complex or you're constantly pairing the two together, consider graduating to Coda to save yourself long-term headaches. Notion is great for personal use, but the powerful automation and collaboration features in Coda make it a better fit for teams in my experience so far.
Read full review
We utilize many products in the SAP universe of solutions. Not only was JAM feature-rich and matched our company needs, but the tight integration with our other SAP product lines makes admin as well as usability seamless. While other competitors to JAM offer more features that rely on real-time, most of our use cases were asynchronous.
Read full review
Scalability
I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Increased insight for all stakeholders involved--both in terms of overview and details
  • Better grip on issues and escalations--reduced friction, confusion, and higher clarity on status, next actions, and ownership.
  • Reduced time required by those who need to maintain all information. Record (a detail) once and use multiple times.
Read full review
  • Connecting employees together across a disparate org is crucial and has a positive impact on productivity.
  • Allowing users to create their own groups shifts the power to the people who know what they need and can create instantly. In today's ever-narrowing sales cycle, this is crucial.
  • Mobile-friendly plus a native app is necessary as our direct & dealer channel sales teams are often on-the-go.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Coda by Grammarly Screenshots

Screenshot of One unified surface means ideas aren’t limited to a file type. A project doesn’t have to be split across tabs of documents, spreadsheets, and apps.Screenshot of Packs are a version of integrations or plug-ins. They connect the  doc to the apps in use every day, so as to pull live data in or push updates out automatically.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop templates provide a quick-start shortcut to commonly used templates like Upvote/Downvote, To-Do List, and Team Sentiment Tracker.Screenshot of Slice, dice, and chop data using Views. A View is a mirror of data that can be tailored to unique needs, all while staying connected to the source.Screenshot of When accessing the doc from a mobile device, it should feel like an app. Doc pages become tabs, buttons become swipe actions and doc notifications become push notifications.Screenshot of The Doc Gallery contains docs self-published by the Coda community. These published docs have a webpage-like interface and have varying levels of interactivity like view, play or edit. Find and share tools, templates, tiny apps, interactive handbooks, and anything else that can be built in Coda.