Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager) vs. Net2Phone

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Call Manager is a unified call control center from Cisco that supports enterprise collaboration functions across the spectrum of IP telephony, video & web conferencing, and messaging. Features include call forwarding, call back, call transfer, ad hoc conferencing, and call park.N/A
Net2Phone
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Net2Phone is a VoIP solutions provider headdquartered in Newark, whose services include Hosted PBX, unified communications for remote workforces including live calling, live chat, and also web conferencing through their Huddle app available now in beta release, Microsoft Teams direct routing, and SIP Trunking which integrates directly into on-prem or existing IP PBX systems.
$24.99
per month per user
Pricing
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Office
$24.99
per month per user
Office Pro
$26.99
per month per user
Office Power
$29.99
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Features
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Net2Phone
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
User templates7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call reports6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Directory of employee names8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Net2Phone
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Answering rules9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call recording7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Call park9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call screening8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Message alerts8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Net2Phone
-
Ratings
Video conferencing8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio conferencing8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Video screen sharing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant messaging9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Net2Phone
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)Net2Phone
Likelihood to Recommend
The Cisco Unified Communications Manager platform would be most suited for the below scenarios. 1. An organization with very restricted policies and compliance where can't move to cloud-based solutions for data security. They can install the CUCM on-premises. 2. An organization that is still on a legacy phone system could adopt CUCM to save costs and have better services.
Read full review
With a bustling office of workers going out to meetings, lunches, and sometimes working from home, having calls roll over and basically "finding" us, whether it's going from office to meeting room to cell phone, is essential! And having each employee able to create their own settings and change them day to day is a plus! Also having a group of phones ring at once, so any of a number of people can answer, while not bothering other offices, is imperative. No call gets missed and no one is bothered by constant ringing. Win-win
Read full review
Pros
  • Customizability - The program allows for a lot of specific features and ways to use the program.
  • Traditional - The system is a very traditional phone system, with everything you would expect and need from an enterprise phone system.
  • Expandable - The system allows from a small amount of users to a large amount, with no upper limit.
Read full review
  • High quality sound
  • Stable web application
  • Great support 24/7
Read full review
Cons
  • CUCM is overly complex and requires a very capable engineer to maintain it. Similarly, implementing anything new requires a great deal of specialized knowledge of CUCM.
  • CUCM is difficult to troubleshoot because of it's complexity.
  • CUCM is expensive licensing and they nickel and dime you with a plethora of tiny little license charges for every little feature. They have the most convoluted licensing models, ever, for their CU products in general.
Read full review
  • A little convoluted to use their video conferencing.....Huddle
  • Not always easy to call forward my calls
  • Have a different voice for their recording of a welcome menu
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been using this product for 20+ years and will continue too. This is a great product and new features are always coming out.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Although it's very easy to use, once you understand the concepts of IP telephony, as I said before, I think Cisco could have improved the management interface of the platform, adding modern technologies and the design language of the other platforms like DNA Center, etc. This interface hasn't had a substantial improvement for about 10 years
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CUCM is supported by most third-party vendors for related products, so it makes finding solutions to specific needs easy. Also Cisco TAC is very knowledgeable, and we have never run into a problem they have not been able to resolve. Usually they are resolved without the need to escalate tickers either.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
This was the first phone system we implemented that could span multiple locations. We were very satisfied once fully implemented
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The Cisco Call Manager application has been around for much longer than many of the competitors. As such, they have had plenty of time to resolve bugs and increase the feature set that comes natively with this solution. One of the biggest factors for us was the professional services/support that comes along with using any Cisco product.
Read full review
I wish the Zoom chat feature could be a little more dynamic and security and privacy could be improved a little bit, but there are also things the administrator can do to enhance security and privacy. Messages sent privately between callers are not easily visible to recipients; overall, I am happy with Zoom, but no harm in trying other applications that people are talking great about; hence I tried my hands on Net2Phone!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Return on Investment as one shot investment was made then only licensing contract renewing is needed.
  • Virtualized environment and centralized administration tools.
  • Money saving as a result on using features like TEHO.
  • Business continuity assured on environments with SRST and Multi site Deployment with Distributed Call Processing.
Read full review
  • Reduced time of support to our users
  • Problems if it hangs once and can be time consuming to restore you task in in between anything
  • Not sure about ROI but for the organization it should have benn reduced as using only 1 application now instead of 2 or 3.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Net2Phone Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of