Cisco UC-One vs. West Unified Communications Services (discontinued)

For a company like ours where 24/7 reliability is important both for the safety of our techs and the ability to complete the task at hand, this product has served us well. Like any other tech change, there was an initial learning curve, but this one was low and our time to implementation short

Incentivized

It is well suited in our organization for their large department Monday meetings and meetings such as that. Would not really be needed for a conference call with only 10 people or less attending.

Incentivized

• Clear quality of service
• easy implementation
• good return on investment

Incentivized

• Large conference calls
• Reliable calling technology
• Easy to call in with no confusion

Incentivized

• Mobile App Chats do not always sync to the PC application.
• Switching from WiFi to Cellular on mobile applications typically drops the call.
• Caller ID on the iPhone/iPad app only shows the phone number and not the Caller ID information.

Incentivized

• Hold music is normally loud and not pleasant

Incentivized

Jive as a whole has a better back end user interface, however, BroadSoft UC One far surpasses it in terms of overall functionality. The larger feature set (IM, Softphone [Jive has], collab bridge, etc) makes the slightly less intuitive back end a small ding against the software as a whole. Plus the stability of UC One as a whole is much higher as well.

Incentivized

We only use intercall and always have, our in house phone system is Cisco.

Incentivized

• The services as a whole are a better feature set for a better price.
• The software is much easier to use and administrate than previous offerings on the same platform offering a better customer experience.
• Updates made to the back end are not well communicated and sometimes cause unexpected behavior as a result.

Incentivized

• It does cost our company money so we try to give out numbers only when needed

Incentivized