Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) vs. VMware NSX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco SD-Access
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) provides automated end-to-end segmentation to separate user, device and application traffic without redesigning the network. Cisco SD-Access automates user access policy so organizations can make sure the right policies are established for any user or device with any application across the network.N/A
VMware NSX
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
VMware NSX is network virtualization technology. VMware NSX is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)VMware NSX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco SD-AccessVMware NSX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)VMware NSX
Best Alternatives
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)VMware NSX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
It's well suited in our corporate offices, where all our business users resides and where we can control all their accesses. What doesn't really fit well is when we have our branch fronts, where all the software domain access features aren't utilized to its fullest, due to the fact that customers and users don't really need to have all the security features that SDA provides.
Read full review
Our high-security environments require end to end encryption, but also tend to have larger budgets. Since beginning utilization of VMware NSX, we've been able to meet the unique requirements for our high-security clients, but it does have a large price tag that goes along with it. This isn't a particularly well-suited solution for environments with tighter budgets, but it definitely provides security where we need it and are willing to pay for this solution
Read full review
Pros
  • Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower.
  • Assurance [helps trace] issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as [the] best practices.
  • Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
  • Broadcast Suppression: By suppressing broadcast traffic, we have been able to deploy a single VDI network in a /18 network space, allowing for rapid growth and proper DHCP lease timing for a VDI instant clone environment.
  • Networking HA: Leveraging internal mechanisms for high availability, it provides disaster resiliency to a virtual networking environment.
  • Cost Savings: All available features of NSX are licensed simultaneously. Load balancers, firewalls, and routers are all licensed as features, not per object, allowing for the deployment of as many of these objects as are needed.
Read full review
Cons
  • Documentation: Working in this solution I realized there were missing information details about the fusion device support for nexus.
  • Fusion router: This roll in the fabric should be already integrated in the solution, right now it is configured manually.
  • Bugs: Unfortunately the solution still present a lot of bugs, mainly in the controller.
Read full review
  • Our biggest challenge is gaining acceptance from network engineers who are used to working with other technologies.
Read full review
Usability
It is difficult to start using the product due to its unfamiliar name and acronyms. ,The task should be accomplished in a specific order to ensure success
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As far as my experience with SD-Access -I'd say things that can be improved are - better functionality with ISE, ease to understand licensing and better documentation for configuration (add-ons, etc), and licensing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
I rated the training an 8 because overall, it was well-structured, and the instructor was highly knowledgeable on the subject matter. The content was relevant, and I appreciated the clear explanations of complex topics. However, I felt that some sections were covered too quickly, making it difficult to fully absorb the information before moving on. Additionally, I would have liked more time dedicated to Q&A, as there were moments when I had questions but didn’t get the opportunity to ask them due to time constraints. Adding more interactive discussions or hands-on exercises could further enhance the learning experience and make it even more engaging
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
At the beginning, we had to open a TAC case for every single step during the implementation phase.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Basically, we have various devices and solutions from Cisco and we are more focused on the next generation networks with the best support. We knew that Cisco has the best team sitting to support [any] issues and help us to troubleshoot whenever we need it. So we go with Cisco for this solution.
Read full review
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not all. It's focus relies on physical networking changes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive: Less time to provisioning a device in the campus Lan network
  • Positive: Less time to troubleshoot the network
  • Negative: the implementation phase itself was too long because of a lot of bugs in the oldest versions.
Read full review
  • Easy to manage networking and security
  • Better visibility into the environments
Read full review
ScreenShots