Cisco SD-Access review
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
We are using Cisco SD-Access for [the] whole organization. With the help of Cisco SD-Access, we are able to address the problems [of] automation through DNA center, network insight through assurance, and segmentation using SGTs. We deployed [Cisco] SD-Access in all our offices across Canada with two-layer architecture. Moving out from the complex traditional to next-generation networks save[s] our timelines for critical projects.
Pros
- Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower.
- Assurance [helps trace] issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as [the] best practices.
- Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Cons
- There are some issues we are facing like the stability of the DNA center versions.
- Need to simplify the licenses used for Devices and the DNA center which is hard to understand and explain further.
Do you think Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) again?
Yes
- Time and manpower save in case of configuration devices.
- Easy to find issues and guided process to troubleshoot issues through DNA center.
- Integrations and API calls helps beyond the expectations
- ROI
- Arista Campus Switches, Aruba Networks Wireless LAN (WLAN) and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches
Basically, we have various devices and solutions from Cisco and we are more focused on the next generation networks with the best support. We knew that Cisco has the best team sitting to support [any] issues and help us to troubleshoot whenever we need it. So we go with Cisco for this solution.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation