Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco SD-Access
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) provides automated end-to-end segmentation to separate user, device and application traffic without redesigning the network. Cisco SD-Access automates user access policy so organizations can make sure the right policies are established for any user or device with any application across the network.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Prisma SD-WAN (formerly known as CloudGenix but now as Prisma from Palo Alto Networks since being acquired in April 2020) offers an Autonomous SD-WAN solution, designed to provide app-policies aligned to business intent, along with direct access to multi-cloud and dev-ops frameworks to deliver unparalleled productivity gains, and cost-savings compared to first generation SD-WAN alternatives.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco SD-AccessPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Best Alternatives
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.2 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.2 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
It's well suited in our corporate offices, where all our business users resides and where we can control all their accesses. What doesn't really fit well is when we have our branch fronts, where all the software domain access features aren't utilized to its fullest, due to the fact that customers and users don't really need to have all the security features that SDA provides.
Read full review
It is well suited for any company who would like to implement an SDWan solution. Their Implementation team is well suited to analyze your existing infrastructure and build out the SDWan solution to meet your company needs. Their portals are user-friendly and easy to navigate and they are continually adding new and improved features.
Read full review
Pros
  • Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower.
  • Assurance [helps trace] issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as [the] best practices.
  • Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
  • Circuit Monitoring
  • QOS of network traffic
  • High Availability
Read full review
Cons
  • Documentation: Working in this solution I realized there were missing information details about the fusion device support for nexus.
  • Fusion router: This roll in the fabric should be already integrated in the solution, right now it is configured manually.
  • Bugs: Unfortunately the solution still present a lot of bugs, mainly in the controller.
Read full review
  • Some warning messages are hard to pinpoint the actual issue.
  • Support was faster at first, seems to not be as quick as in the beginning.
Read full review
Usability
It is difficult to start using the product due to its unfamiliar name and acronyms. ,The task should be accomplished in a specific order to ensure success
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As far as my experience with SD-Access -I'd say things that can be improved are - better functionality with ISE, ease to understand licensing and better documentation for configuration (add-ons, etc), and licensing.
Read full review
The support was super fast in the beginning. Sometimes it seems now that the support does not get back to you as quickly. When we do get in contact with the support, they are usually knowledgeable and can help find the problem. The support has also been easy to work with.
Read full review
Online Training
I rated the training an 8 because overall, it was well-structured, and the instructor was highly knowledgeable on the subject matter. The content was relevant, and I appreciated the clear explanations of complex topics. However, I felt that some sections were covered too quickly, making it difficult to fully absorb the information before moving on. Additionally, I would have liked more time dedicated to Q&A, as there were moments when I had questions but didn’t get the opportunity to ask them due to time constraints. Adding more interactive discussions or hands-on exercises could further enhance the learning experience and make it even more engaging
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
At the beginning, we had to open a TAC case for every single step during the implementation phase.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Basically, we have various devices and solutions from Cisco and we are more focused on the next generation networks with the best support. We knew that Cisco has the best team sitting to support [any] issues and help us to troubleshoot whenever we need it. So we go with Cisco for this solution.
Read full review
CloudGenix is the first product with SDWAN that we have used. There are others out there, but I cannot speak to those as I do not have any experience with them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive: Less time to provisioning a device in the campus Lan network
  • Positive: Less time to troubleshoot the network
  • Negative: the implementation phase itself was too long because of a lot of bugs in the oldest versions.
Read full review
  • It has saved us a lot of money moving from an MPLS connection.
  • It has given better video quality with international calls.
Read full review
ScreenShots