Cisco NCS 1000 Optical Systems vs. OpenNMS Meridian

This Cisco platform creates a secure channel whereby all the company's data can easily be managed and the integration supports is on top, giving the user the ability to handle a huge amount of various data at once and the reports are very reliable and easy to make. Notification tools are very active and also network-building tools are effective and easy options for understanding.

Incentivized

Large network environments with few types of devices. The system is great but getting all of the MIBs loaded and to try and create unique rules /alarm type. Alarm correlation is doable but it takes too much manual work and XML configuration. I do enjoy the dashboard and surveillance categories.

Incentivized

• Label switch routing.
• Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile.
• Ethernet switching.

Incentivized

• When we used OpenNMS you could download the base package for free and configure it fairly easily for your own environment. You can't beat that kind of price break.
• OpenNMS had a very nice looking GUI that was easily navigated and fairly straightforward to understand and configure.
• There were a wide variety of add-ons available for download and implementation.

Incentivized

• Configuration of the features is not that easy.
• Multiple network connections management to new users is turf.
• Monitoring all the networks and servers performance through the tool.

Incentivized

• It takes a fair amount of experimentation to fine tune information collection.
• Configuration can be quite cumbersome with a steep learning curve. It would be nice if more of this could be done via the web dashboard.
• The reliance on Java will put some users off. However, in fairness, it does mean it runs on a wide variety of hardware.

Incentivized

As it runs on XR there the config is very straightforward. We implement the design obtained from the engineering team and haven't had issues. I have opened few tickets to resolve any doubts and Cisco has been supportive so far.

Incentivized

I have used Cisco 5000 series mostly as it has other L3 routing capabilities. We use it on core to route IS-IS, OSPF and also peer it on BGP.

Incentivized

Although Grafana is in no way an alternative to OpenNMS's full functionality, it can be integrated with other solutions (including OpenNMS itself) to offer the graphing and data visualisation aspects of OpenNMS. In this regard, Grafana is more flexible, and some would say prettier, than OpenNMS's graphing. For the best of both worlds, I'd recommend using them both!

Incentivized

It supports hundred-gig links and ten-gig links, and scalability hasn't been a problem with this device. It can used on distribution layer.

Incentivized

• Better experience on network traffic management.
• Obtaining processing reports is excellent.
• Nice for the easy data moving.
• Information sharing tool.

Incentivized

• We've been able to improve our customers' experience.
• Because we're able to respond to issues quicker, we're able to better meet our SLAs.
• We are able to see smaller problems and address them before they become big problems.

Incentivized