Cisco Intersight vs. HPE OneView

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Intersight
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Intersight is an operations platform that helps IT operations teams control and automate Cisco UCS, converged, and hyperconverged infrastructure. Intersight consolidates and automates infrastructure lifecycle management from data centers to the edge in one solution delivered as-a-service.N/A
HPE OneView
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
HPE OneView is an IT infrastructure monitoring platform, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
Pricing
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Best Alternatives
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco IntersightHPE OneView
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco Intersight is very well suited for doing firmware upgrades across all of your cisco hardware. So far we have had no problems pushing out new firmware. It's also well suited for hardware management. Cisco TAC has the ability to pull logs for the IMC for themselves, which saves you from having to pull the logs yourself and then uploading them to the case. It may or may not be appropriate for upgrading operating systems. I have not been able to test it.
Read full review
I have found that HPE OneView is well suited for all of our scenarios in our shared data center platform to control all the compute hardware with firmware, patches and profiles of all compute components.
Read full review
Pros
  • Standardising the environment by enforcing use of updating templates.
  • Show the difference on a profile between what has changed and what setting was last deployed.
  • Perform bulk deploy operation on profiles (like server profiles).
  • Policies underpin all settings (e.g. no more defining individual VLANs before being able to use them, or having to clean them up manually when they are no longer in use. You deploy a Domain VLAN policy that states which VLANs are configured on a domain (either standalone) or a domain profile template (if domains profiles are bound to an updating domain profile template).
Read full review
  • Managing the overall Blade profiles and the ability to have access to all equipment from one central repository.
Read full review
Cons
  • It is difficult to spot an added or removed VLAN in an Ethernet Network Group Policy or VLAN Policy. The comparison widget will show you that something has changed, but if you have 100s of VLANs, the difference does not stand out. Workaround: we copy the data out and compare it in a text editor.
  • If you are transitioning from UMM to IMM, you lose some functionality like vNIC redundancy pairs.
  • It is not easy to map the UMM version 4.x server firmware version to the equivalent IMM version 5.x firmware version.
  • It is not possible to configure out-of-band management IP addresses on a per-domain basis. You have to configure these ranges via an IMC Access policy (which contains the IP address range/pool) on the server profile. This leads to "server profile template sprawl" where we have to maintain multiple server profile templates since our domains sit on different ranges, even though the servers are for the most part configured identically.
  • UCS domains in IMM only support one Ethernet Network Group Policy (VLAN group) per vNIC template.
Read full review
  • Managing the 3Pard Oneview will allow you to do things like reuse LUN IDs and setup multiple export groups with the same volume. This can cause performance issues, or worse. They could do a better job of protecting you from yourself...
  • Complicated initial configuration
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Been using Cisco Software as a service (SaaS) platform in a production environment for a large medical and health professionals that has critical healthcare and patients care dependency.
Support team is very helpful getting system updated as needed, and vendor support is fantastic. Also get a dedicated Cisco networking engine to review and advise system health and recommendations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Usability of Cisco Intersight is highly dependent on the licensing purchased. The default (free) license level provides a lot of value for the minimal amount of effort to implement. The paid license levels provide additional features (detailed inventory, configuration management and deployment, etc.)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
If you have bigger problems with the on-prem version, the support team is sometimes a bit slow in their reactions and you have to keep going, to get your help. But finally, all problems, that we have addressed, have been resolved to my full appreciation!
Read full review
Support and training when we implemented OneView were excellent. We haven't required any additional support since we put it in and configured it for our systems. The OneView systems have been stable through updates and HPE documentation is excellent.
Read full review
Online Training
You really need a lab to get hands on but it was useful
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Very smooth process and we did it for 2 data centers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Our organisation has some experience with Dell OME (the centralised management plane for Dell PowerEdge server, equivalent to Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service and UCS Manager, but not enough to contrast the two or say why one is better than the other.
Read full review
If you are using modern HPE equipment there really are no alternatives.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The negative thing is that we prefer to use the UCS Manager in our company because this bare metal is integrated into the FI and no extra appliance is required. SaaS is generally not viewed favorably in Germany.
  • Telling the user that they have to buy Intersight licenses even if they use UCS Manager annoys our customers.
Read full review
  • Easy to use and saves time in maintenance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Intersight Screenshots

Screenshot of the Intersight dashboard, which provides out-of-the box summaries of real-time health and performance data across data center and edge infrastructure. Users can customize the dashboard with a library of widgets to quickly see information that's most important to them.Screenshot of the security advisories and field notices that alert users about endpoint devices in their environment that are impacted along with recommended resolution.Screenshot of the Topology Views that let users quickly identify any UCS domain connectivity issues thorugh a visual representation.Screenshot of an example of the automated workflows that users can create, using Intersight's drag-and-drop workflow designer and library of tasks and workflows.Screenshot of an example of the aggregated and visualized metrics that are collected for fabric interconnects, chassis, and servers to monitor devices, optimize performance, identify bottlenecks, and proactively address any potential issues.