Cisco FlexPod vs. Hitachi Unified Compute Platform CI Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco FlexPod
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
FlexPod is a converged infrastructure option developed by NetApp and Cisco. FlexPod is available in streamlined and simplified Express version, and the FlexPod Datacenter edition for enterprise private clouds, VDI, scale-out infrastructure, or software defined data centers.N/A
Hitachi UCP CI
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Hitachi Vantara offers the Hitachi Unified Compute Platform CI series (or Hitachi UCP CI) product line of converged infrastructure solutions.N/A
Pricing
Cisco FlexPodHitachi Unified Compute Platform CI Series
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco FlexPodHitachi UCP CI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco FlexPodHitachi Unified Compute Platform CI Series
User Ratings
Cisco FlexPodHitachi Unified Compute Platform CI Series
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco FlexPodHitachi Unified Compute Platform CI Series
Likelihood to Recommend
  • Scenarios where downtime isn't possible.
  • Being able to move a physical server config to another physical server within the FlexPod is a god send.
  • Hardware fails, we all know that.
  • It happens, by being able to move a profile from one blade to another, it allows you to quickly and easily restore service while waiting for hardware to arrive onsite to repair/replace the failed component.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Single Pane of Glass Server Administration.
  • Ease of firmware upgrades.
  • Incredible support when you have an issue. The Cisco/NetApp/VMware FlexPod support teams work together and drive your issues down to the root cause.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • KVM control of the blades still requires Java. Avocent is using HTML5 now, and it would be nice if the KVM console for these UCS blades could too.
  • Price - Like any Cisco product, there are cheaper options. They aren't nearly as fully featured, but at times, it would be nice if UCS could be a bit cheaper.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have made use of Smartstack, vBlock and Flashstack, as well as other mixes of storage and virtualization hosts, and FlexPod is probably still my favorite. While something like a Nimble Smartstack or Pure Flashstack is easier to maintain, I love the in depth information and control that a SAN such as Netapp offers us. There is more knowledge and skill required to manage it, but the maturity of the product helps make up for that.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • FlexPod has allowed our team to be extremely quick to resopnd to new VM build requests. The amount of RAM, CPU and backplane offered by B series blades allows us to go with very high VM density. The quick deployment of service profile templates also means that when we have to add new hosts, it is done quicker.
  • FlexPod and the service profile portability (along with VMware) has allowed for full upgrades and migrations from M1/M2 series hardware to M4 hardware without any downtime or outages to the clients. Blades can be moved into new chassis, or service profiles moved to new generation blades, with no impact to the customers' ability to work.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots