TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000) vs. Juniper MX Series

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000) helps enable superior network agility, packet optical convergence, and petabits-per-second system scale.N/A

    Juniper MX Series

    Score6.2 out of 10
    N/AJuniper Networks describes their MX series as a robust portfolio of SDN-enabled routing platforms that provide system capacity, density, security, and performance with longevity. MX Series routers support digital transformation for service providers, cloud operators, and enterprises.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)Juniper MX Series
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)Juniper MX Series
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)Juniper MX Series
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Routers
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco Routers
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Routers
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco Routers
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)Juniper MX Series
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)Juniper MX Series
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    Since we've been using it for a long time, that justifies and explains to you that this product is a sound product and is secure. The product has great support after-sales support services from Cisco. So the moment we have an issue that we cannot resolve ourselves, it is so easy to contact the Cisco engineers. They are around the clock, they are ready to support and resolve issues, and technical issues, and also for upgrades of our networks to ensure that we have the latest patches and latest operating systems that will help us defend or secure our network better. We are very happy with the level of support we are getting currently from Cisco and I don't think we are going anywhere else other than Cisco. We are happy with the way it is currently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Juniper Networks
    I think the Juniper MX series is a fantastic option for data center connectivity and places that aren't very high touch, but need good reliability and uptime. These switches are a bit more difficult to use day to day, but their reliability and robustness make them a great fit for data centers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Packet forwarding and routing
    • Tech support
    • Performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Juniper Networks
    • It's a robust platform, very resilient. It handles large traffic flows well.
    • It's a flexible architecture, it can be configured with provider or enterprise options (or both!)
    • It has an excellent versioning system, simple commit/confirm/rollback procedures!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • I think now that we are moving into cloud migrations and cloud services, I think now the new routers that are coming out are cloud-friendly so to speak, and also can provide us with a higher level of security because of the continuous threats that we are receiving from different type of actors around the world. So security is also critical for cloud migration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Juniper Networks
    • Storm Control needs to have a way to see what going on in the CLI in a more straight forward fashion
    • They need a GUI interface much like the old Nortel Network equipment.
    • Not the routers fault but support costs have increased.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Juniper Networks
    Working with Juniper switches can be a bit of a chore compared to other brands, like Cisco or HP. This makes me drop the rating for usability down to a 6, because for higher touch environments, I wouldn't recommend a Juniper. Outside of data center use cases, a Cisco switch would be a better option.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Juniper Networks
    We preferred Juniper over Cisco for our WAN/Internet routing needs for a number of reasons. First was the price, the Juniper offering was much more competitive than Cisco's. Secondly, was feature set, Juniper's implementation of routing protocols, routing tables, and forwarding options are better thought-out than Cisco's (not to mention Juniper's longstanding use of commit/confirm/rollback features, which Cisco has only started to use recently, and only on some of their products).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Easy to use
    • Good security
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Juniper Networks
    • Being dependable has allowed our network to stay running allowing for everyone to be productive.
    • Cost of the routers was very reasonable allowing us to keep our budget under control.
    • Support cost on our routers is not terribly high.
    • We link our routers to Cisco and Aruba with no issue. Interoperable give us flexibility of choice
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots