Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000) vs. FireMon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000) is a high-density, small-form-factor MPLS aggregation router for metro aggregation and MPLS-enabled data center networks. The Network Convergence System 5000 Series is designed to economically scale large enterprise, over-the-top (OTT), and service provider data center networking architectures.N/A
FireMon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
Pricing
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Best Alternatives
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000)FireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
This device appears to be better suited on the edge of networks and less capable as a core device. It is very suitable to provide high bandwidth connectivity to the customer networks as well as providing adequate bandwidth to the core network.
Read full review
FireMon is best used in a large environment (for example, I have >100
firewalls in my environment). It's best used when trying to improve
security posture and showing changes in firewall security over time. It
might not be the best choice for smaller environments or those that aren't concerned about security management.
Read full review
Pros
  • Prioritize high bandwidth devices such as video conferencing.
  • Versatility for use with cloud applications.
Read full review
  • PCI Reporting - After identifying which firewalls and rulesets are in scope, producing a report artifact to satisfy PCI requirements on Firewall reviews is literally a two-click operation.
  • Storing Rule Metadata - FireMon stores metadata (prefilled fields, standard fields, and custom fields) for each rule in each policy which is valuable for context during firewall reviews in particular
  • API - FireMon exposes most if not all of its functionality via REST API
Read full review
Cons
  • Increased backwards compatibility would allow for more existing or older hardware to be installed within the new chassis if physically possible.
  • Streamlined OS upgrades, and the NCS have taken steps to avoid having the reload the entire device when upgrading software, but can be further improved.
  • Continued upgrades to hardware results in longer shelf life for the chassis, allowing less frequent purchases and upgrades.
Read full review
  • Some features could be added to the existing functionality which include NAT rules usage
  • Rule expiration normalization from firewalls rather than entering them in rule documentation
  • .csv exports of the files from the firewall pane only gives usage for 30 days by default and that should be increased
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Once all the customization has been completed, the business is starting to see the return on investment. The visibility it provides into the network gear that is owned by other IT groups is immeasurable and has allowed us to apply standards across the board. The only thing I have concern with is their support documentation.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It save me time and I'm able to have the review - review the rule independently with using my time.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
FireMon has been relatively stable overall. However, there have been a handful of times where we had issues with the console. For example, we couldn't update which devices to include in a security assessment. The initial suggestion from support was to just reboot it. It seems like there weren't many other options available such as to restart services before going to the extreme of a complete reboot.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
I'm not sure we have the largest implementation of FireMon out there but we do have a few 1000 devices being probed by FireMon. Overall, the system's performance has been rock solid. The console refreshes quickly and reports are generated within an expected timeframe.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
FireMon technical support is awesome! They respond quickly to our requests and they are well trained and very knowledgeable about the tool. Some issues have to be referred to the development team, but technical support largely provides solutions for any issues that we may have.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation is fairly simple. Most issues can be resolved by referencing manuals.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We did not consider any other alternatives, the NCS 5000 fit the bill for what we were looking for and we pulled the trigger.
Read full review
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can easily import firewalls and begin to work on them to improve them
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Firemon Is easily scalable and maintainable with any size team. Although it requires some tech debt, it is well worth the time to invest to ensure compliance is visible and reports are accurate. Although our environment is very large we do not fully utilize the scalability of the Firemon product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Long lasting high roi
  • High preforming density
  • Support for when things need fixings
Read full review
  • It helps us save us time in determining what change was made and by whom.
  • Real time alerting is a great convenience in helping us know if something went wrong, we can immediately review the last report to determine what has changed.
  • Allows us to determine what rules are not used and if said rules are still required.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco 5000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 5000) Screenshots

Screenshot of Product Description: MPLS aggregation router for metro aggregation, MPLS Enabled TOR/Leaf Architectures
Target Deployments: Enterprise, Over-The-Top (OTT), and Service Provider data center networking architectures