Checkmarx vs. S4 for Salesforce

If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.

Incentivized

S4 for Salesforce is the best platform for large recruiting firm for recruitment processes and a lot of candidates. CRM provide the best solution for any recruiting firm. Salesforce is well suited in our company because it allows recruiters to store the data of every and each candidate in our system and also we don't have the fear of loosing the data.

Incentivized

• Supports a large number of languages
• Finds a large variety of potential risks

Incentivized

• Analytics
• CRM
• Data storage

Incentivized

• DAST capability can be the one where it does not support native use case of using OTP based arch
• API Scanning is something that lacks a bit due to not much customizations
• Branch wise reports for SAST is not available

Incentivized

• Mobile accessibility
• Complex UI
• Cost

Incentivized

Checkmarx's usability is generally good, but it can be a bit complex for new users. The interface may take some time to get used to, especially for those unfamiliar with security tools. Once you become familiar with it, it’s effective and integrates well into development workflows.

Incentivized

Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems

Incentivized

In S4 for Salesforce highly integrated with salesforce ecosystem. Salesforce gives capabilities for candidate and client management. In Adapt Bullhorn: Bull horn does not have built in integration. but if provides its own CRM. In SS4 for Salesforce: you can edit, customize the UI according to your needs. In Adapt Bullhorn: it also provides you the customizable Interface but not as much as Salesforce

Incentivized

• Great diversity of vulnerabilities covered.
• Quicker scans
• They are feature rich compared to other tools I used in the past.
• Dashboards are not customizable enough.
• High number of false positives take up time and sometimes make our report look bad.

Incentivized

• Helps in Better decision making
• Improved data storage
• Adoption and Cost

Incentivized