TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Carbonite Endpoint

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ACarbonite Endpoint provides an enterprise-grade backup solution for all endpoints, including mobile devices or devices spread across a distributed enterprise network.

    $24

    per month

    Goliath Performance Monitor

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AGoliath Performance Monitor is an IT infrastructure monitoring platform from Goliath Technologies in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.N/A
    Pricing
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Editions & Modules
    Basic Computer Backup
    $24
    per month
    Advanced Endpoint Protection
    $34
    per month
    Basic Server Backup
    $50
    per month
    Basic Backup
    $55
    per month
    Advanced Server Protection
    $147
    per month
    Advanced Protection
    $199
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Considered Both Products
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    No answer on this topic
    Goliath Technologies
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Carbonite Endpoint and Goliath Performance Monitor
    Feature
    Carbonite Endpoint
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Goliath Performance Monitor
    -
    Ratings
    Instant recovery8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recovery verification4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management dashboard6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform support4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Retention options4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Carbonite Endpoint and Goliath Performance Monitor
    Feature
    Carbonite Endpoint
    6.5
    1 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Goliath Performance Monitor
    -
    Ratings
    Continuous data protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Replication9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operational reporting and analytics4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware protection4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Small Businesses
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Veeam ONE
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Icinga
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Veeam ONE
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (23 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Carbonite EndpointGoliath Performance Monitor
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    Carbonite Endpoint 360 is a great solution for any organization with compliance needs. Office 365 defaults to a 30 day backup of all data. Carbonite Endpoint 360 extends this well beyond 30 days and provides an all-inclusive source for retention for data in Office 365. Any small to medium business would greatly benefit from this solution as they can design their entire infrastructure in Office 365 and ensure it's all backed up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    GPM is well suited to environments where there is a high volume of Citrix traffic coupled with a lot of different hardware infrastructure endpoints. Large scale multi-user operations where performance issue detection and resolution are key are the primary areas where GPM excels. Use of the GPM product is less appropriate when trying to monitor response times in a JVM application environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    • It is excellent at automating your backups. You don't need to manually do it, just set it up once and let it run in the background.
    • It's pretty simple to set up and use. It will automatically suggest the best options that work for most people and you can be up and running pretty quickly.
    • It's safe and reliable. We have been using it for a couple of years now and had no major issues.
    • Their phone support is excellent.
    • It's also really easy to maintain your backed up data to reduce redundancy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    • GPM does exceptionally well at gathering and presenting deep metrics from our Citrix servers and storing them in the GPM database server. This is a vital strength for any system monitoring tool and allows administrators to address almost any system related performance question.
    • The MonitorIT front end console does a great job of providing graphical views the summarize data from a multitude of locations. This is particularly important in that it allows administrators to focus in on the reasons for performance issues in a proactive manner before hearing from the end users, especially given the large volumes of detailed data captured by the system
    • The MonitorIT product is also very adept at gathering metrics across the processing continuum, providing metrics for system resources, service availability and end-to-end user activity. This is a great strength of the system and allows us to develop Tableau visualizations in addition to the extensive reports and dashboarding capabilities of the GPM product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    • To be honest not so impressed with the amount of time it has taken to get data backed up to the cloud.
    • I have not had to do a restore at this time so I cannot comment on the restore process.
    • I was not aware at time of procurement that the upload process would take so long since we were not procuring their hardware. Sales rep mad it seem like upload would only take a day or two and we are now starting week 7 hoping to be done by week 8 for 1.5 TBs of data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    • From a purely personal level I would like to see MonitorIT be able to consume data from our clinical/operational databases instead of relying only on taking data in via the agent, log files and scripted sysoutput.
    • I think some improvements are possible in the area of custom monitoring of file systems, especially for the detection of missing file scenarios and file volume/rates. GPM only monitors traditional file system metrics like I/O, availability and space utilization, but custom scripting is possible within the design of the system.
    • Improvements in documenting the data model of the GPM database schema would also be very useful to advanced users of the system especially when additional external reporting tools are used to extend the GPM usefulness
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    I found their alerting to be very poor. I missed several days of backups without knowledge of this, until I signed into the portal. I would get daily emails reporting backups were in progress or done, but nothing indicating that a backup had been stuck or paused for 3 days. For this reason alone, I did not renew.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    Does what it needs to do quietly and efficiently in the background without interrupting the workflow. It offers instant automated back-ups without troubling the end user. As it is such an automated system, once it is up and running, there is little or no support needed from the service provider. From what I understand the support from Carbonite during the setup and implementation was absolutely fine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    We have also used Mozy Pro and Dropbox. They are all pretty similar in functionality/features of backing up data (not system state or databases as I don't think any of the 3 are well suited for that). To me, it comes down to personal preference and choosing a product that is universal for multiple users, for ease of management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    We eventually settled on GPM because of its very obvious strength and depth with Citrix monitoring. Our entire clinical system is deployed over a Citrix infrastructure so it was essential to choose a system whose key focus was Citrix monitoring. GPM's functionality is unrivaled when it comes to Citrix monitoring which is immediately apparent when one witnesses the deep internals of the Citrix platform being collected and reported on, in close to real-time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Carbonite, an OpenText company
    • Carbonite Endpoint has demonstrated value in its ability to easily restore seemingly lost files for remote users.
    • While we haven't yet had to exercise it, knowing we have the option of remotely wiping endpoints containing sensitive data has brought confidence to our management team that we can mitigate data breaches through preventable means.
    • The privacy issue around device tracking is costing the company in terms of employee trust and morale and needs to be mitigated with appropriate messaging and/or disabling of this feature.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Goliath Technologies
    • GPM has had a decent positive ROI particularly in terms of identifying systemic issues and prevention of system downtimes or resource depletion etc. The GPM product shines a spotlight on configuration and design flaws and as a result makes the systems more stable and responsive, saving us time and effort in diagnosing and reporting on system problems. unfortunately these are quite intangible but nevertheless invaluable business objectives for us, but we can say that downtimes and slowness events have dropped consistently year on year since we deployed GPM.
    • Our overall objectives with the GPM project was to deploy a system that could be deployed centrally in our Corp datacenter while monitoring devices and users out in the facilities across the East, Central and West geographic regions. The cost of the endpoint agents was quite modest and provided great functionality at this price point. In this respect our business objectives are well satisfied and the system has been a complete success.
    • An important aspect of our business objective was to have a monitoring system that didn't require constant maintenance and babysitting, and as such the GPM system has worked out fantastically in that we only use 1-2 staff resources to monitor all the systems mentioned earlier in this review.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots