CaptivateIQ vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CaptivateIQ
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CaptivateIQ in San Francisco offers their flagship sales commission management product designed to enable companies to manage and tailor mission critical sales incentive compensation programs for their workforce.N/A
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting™ (CEA) delivers a commission expense management solution—with full capitalization and amortization capabilities—that lets companies monitor performance obligations and ensure compliance with ASC 606 and IFRS 15 standards. Their Intelligent Revenue Platform enables Xactly to align planning, performance, and prediction functions into one platform.N/A
Pricing
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact Xactly for a demo and pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Considered Both Products
CaptivateIQ
Chose CaptivateIQ
Spiff is supposed to be similar. i chose Captivate because of several reasons:
1-Pricing was much cheaper.
2-it looked a bit easier to implement back then to me
Chose CaptivateIQ
I have used Xactly in the past, and it was a good tool. I would say they are both very similar, don't really have a strong opinion because they did the same thing. CaptiveIQ does do a better job breaking down commission payouts and future payouts for multi-year deals. So …
Chose CaptivateIQ
CaptivateIQ is a huge upgrade.
Chose CaptivateIQ
Xactly wasn't able to even finish our setup, whereas CIQ finished our setup in a month b/c their system was so much easier to use. With Xactly we had to purchase PS hours anytime any change was needed, I am able to update CIQ myself.
Chose CaptivateIQ
Far, Far better than the competition.
Chose CaptivateIQ
We selected CaptivateIQ because they were more receptive and they provided us with all our needs. The other provider was a previous vendor and they still had alot of restrictions that CaptivateIQ did not have.
Chose CaptivateIQ
CaptivateIQ's UI is much easier to use. Xactly had a really old-school traditional feel and was somewhat annoying to figure out how to use initially.
Chose CaptivateIQ
Xactly is very difficult to navigate and too complicated. It is more of a hassle than a tool.
It is something that we would only access when absolutely necessary.
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

No answer on this topic

Features
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
CaptivateIQ
8.2
337 Ratings
10% above category average
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
-
Ratings
Sales compensation plan creation8.4271 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex sales crediting8.5245 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation9.1312 Ratings00 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance8.1211 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting8.2281 Ratings00 Ratings
Incentive modeling8.2207 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy8.1176 Ratings00 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility6.6166 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CaptivateIQ
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
7.3
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CaptivateIQ
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
6.4
2 Ratings
21% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings1.81 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
CaptivateIQ
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
4.7
2 Ratings
49% below category average
Multi-currency support00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings1.81 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings1.81 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings1.81 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(353 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(53 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.8
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CaptivateIQXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
CaptivateIQ
In terms of setting up special incentive programs, it might be better to have those paid out directly. Sometimes the system needs to be manually updated if for say a special service is sold to a pre-existing company. On our end we have to create "new customers" to reflect these new structures of incentives. It still works on CIQ, but it would be helpful for something on the site to allow us to modify this directly.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
CEA is well suited for small and rapidly growing companies where manually calculating commissions expense for ASC606 is not an option due to a lack of internal resources. CEA is less appropriate for larger companies that have the resources and likely a person, or people, who only focus on commissions.
Read full review
Pros
CaptivateIQ
  • Employee Self-Service: CapIQ include self-service portals for employees. This allows them to access their compensation details, track their performance, and understand how their pay is structured.
  • Error reduction - Manual calculation of incentives and bonuses is prone to errors, especially in organizations with complex compensation structures involving multiple variables, such as sales targets, performance metrics, and different payout rates. These errors can result in underpayments, overpayments, or discrepancies in compensation, which can lead to dissatisfaction among employees.
  • Real-Time Updates: In dynamic environments, compensation plans may change frequently due to shifts in business goals or market conditions. Compensation incentive software can quickly adapt to these changes, ensuring that compensation calculations remain accurate even as plans are updated. CapIQ allowed me to track my incentives live.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
  • Amortization waterfalls
  • Locked periods & PPA adjustments
  • Journal entries
Read full review
Cons
CaptivateIQ
  • Reporting is challenging. Even exporting payouts requires selecting a date, so if I want a full year of payouts for the entire team, I have to run 12 reports and combine the data. They have a reporting function, but it also requires a significant setup, and I have yet to figure out how to combine data from all of our plans with different columns.
  • Tracking down changes from prior periods can be tricky. This usually happens due to user error (whoops - admin set up something not quite right), but it might be nice to easily see what changed or why there is an increase or decrease from a prior period impacting the current payout.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
  • Dashboard is on a different page
  • Needing to rerun reports
  • Not being able to download reports and edit them
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CaptivateIQ
It fits our need and allows a lot of piece of mind. It has a lot of features we like and they keep innovativing and adding to it.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
No answers on this topic
Usability
CaptivateIQ
I give this rating because I think that this works really well, and it helps our teams see things faster and we are able to keep up with pay outs, I give Captivate a 10/10 because I love the format and how quickly we are able to see the payouts
Read full review
Xactly Corp
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CaptivateIQ
We used support during our initial setup regarding statment errors. They were quick and concise to respond and help us solve our issues regarding this. They also directed us to the office hours that enabled us to learn of new features and upcoming announcements.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
CaptivateIQ
I worked with a vendor to implement. CIQ support was very good. The implementation was very fast, particularly compared to other platforms
Read full review
Xactly Corp
Go into implementation knowing how you will handle churn, if there are claw backs, treatment for every type of commission payment (i.e. new business, renewals, etc.) and know your average customer life. You'll also want details by customer for as far back as you can go (within reason).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CaptivateIQ
Spiff is super sleek and a top contender, honestly, though the price point difference between Captivate and Spiff took Spiff off the table quickly for us. Sales Cookie: we used it for a bit as Captivate didn't have a Hubspot integration, but we quickly outgrew the software and needed a more complex solution. Xactly just doesn't have a great user experience and level of customization needed for our plans. All of this to say, Captivate absolutely wins every time on value for cost and functionality compared to other solutions we have vetted.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
We selected Xactly CEA for ASC 606.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CaptivateIQ
  • As a sales representative in this 700+ employee company, I couldn't tell you the ROI.
  • I will say it probably saves me an hour a month compared to traditional compensation reviews/approvals (think about PER representative)
  • There was an increase in sales representative satisfaction with commission tracking.
Read full review
Xactly Corp
  • Efficiency
  • Centralized
  • Accurate
Read full review
ScreenShots

CaptivateIQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Automatically syncs commission data to power commission reports in real-time across every team. Data sources can be integrated directly into the commission system.Screenshot of Customized user access and visibility into commission plans and data to meet security and compliance requirements.Screenshot of The Approvals workflow, where reps and managers can ensure every payout is correct before it’s distributed.Screenshot of Displays for business performance by team, comp plan, territory, or any other metric to make data-driven decisions.Screenshot of The reps' view into earnings, with a homepage and customizable commissions statements that outline how much they've earned, details by deal, and future earning potential to keep them motivated.

Xactly Commission Expense Accounting Screenshots

Screenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Reports HomeScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Portfolio SummaryScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Journal EntriesScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Amortization Schedule