Camunda vs. IBM Decision Manager Open Edition

Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.

Incentivized

If the rules are going to be managed by IT people JBoss BRMS is good enough, if you're looking for a tool that will be used only by business analysts, you'll probably like to find for another BRMS

• Task orchestration
• Freeware
• Graphical interface allows normal users to understand business process model diagrams more intuitively

Incentivized

• Business rule management for filtering the candidate
• Automate the possible decision making which reduces the time and increase the productivity
• Whenever business rule changes based on the client requirement.

Incentivized

• Documentation - It is usually daunting for beginners because of lack of good documentation
• Simplified setup on local machine for Camunda Server would help developers test changes quickly
• Easier migration from one deployment version of a Camunda process to another deployment version would help in making changes and deploying them faster.
• Heap memory management becomes issue at times resulting in stuck processes. This needs to be resolved.

Incentivized

• The UI could be better
• It takes time to understand how it works and how to create rules
• Better documentation would be appreciated

Because i think there is not any equal software

Incentivized

Red Hat provides configurable rules and workflow interface that be used by Non-technical users like Operations, Finance etc to develop and automate their operational processes.

Incentivized

Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.

Their supports are highly recommended by me

Incentivized

For high volume and / or complex set of legacy business rules, plan for adequate time for data migration activities.

Incentivized

We were striving to automate the entire process because our core firm focuses on the recruitment process, as I indicated previously. Comprehensive automation, on the other hand, is unthinkable in our sector. As a result, we went with Red Hat Decision Manager, which has handled almost all of our business rule management difficulties. In order to close candidates, we were also able to automate decision-making.

Incentivized

• We've built a good business around developing and deploying Camunda for our clients over the last 7 years.
• Our clients are finding it a cost-effective way to try before they buy.
• There's an over-reliance on big offshore outsourcing shops, which hurts ROI and success rates.

• Quickly write business rules
• Computers can take decision
• Complex event processing

Incentivized