Calabrio WFM vs. Vantage Point

Calabrio Teleopti WFM is widely used in our organization, and once we've gotten the hang of it, it's very simple to use. We can manage the entries to each employee's task lists, plan the turns that each teleworker will cover, and swap turns as needed. We can also automate the completion of scheduled management tasks and calculate how much time each employee spends at the company. This application, in general, ensures increased productivity on the call center platform.

Incentivized

It's great if you have a small contact center and are very comfortable with Vantage Point's coding, and you don't use Macs. Outside of that it can be a pretty tough platform to use. If you are running a large contact center or anything that will change much, I wouldn't recommend Vantage Point

Incentivized

• Schedule management is intuitive and easy to follow
• The ability for agents to request and swap shifts works well
• Agent tools for viewing schedules and requests is user friendly

Incentivized

• Cheap - Vantage point is a very economic solution.
• Strong WFM models - Modified Erlang is great.

Incentivized

• System uptime. We use their cloud solution and unfortunately there's been a number of outages.
• PTO management, could use more features like waitlisting, time off canceling and offline management

• Predications are not accurate, much less than 80% they advertise
• Price point is high
• Try to charge you for indicators [that] would be free on literally any platform, MACD for example

It serves my needs perfectly, but it sometimes glitches where you press a link and it downloads the page instead of opens it.

Incentivized

We didn't have a clear operating agreement, and whenever we would call or email them they would tell us they were working on something, then we wouldn't hear back. We could have solved the problems ourselves if we had known we needed to - poor communication

Incentivized

I have worked for other smaller companies that have just used excel sheets to manage scheduling and it was a complete mess. This is a complete and utter 180 in that scheduling is so simplified and creates/causes basically zero conflict among staff.

Incentivized

We picked Vantage Point based on functionality and price. We wanted something that was purely wfm and not anything else. Vantage Point has an a la carte solution and is very economical. In some ways, the failure of Vantage Point for our application wasn't Vantage Point's fault. We didn't dedicate as many resources as needed. That said, we didn't feel we got any support from their team

Incentivized

• They must work to update the characteristics of the integrated items so that they can be better in general based on user demand.
• In general, the software is very easy to use and offers a wide range of working functions.

Incentivized

• Not much impact.
• Learned we needed to dedicate a full FTE to just program/manage Vantage Point.
• We eventually built our own scheduling tool since it was not intuitive.

Incentivized