Built for Teams vs. SilkRoad Recruiting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Built for Teams
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service.N/A
SilkRoad Recruiting
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SilkRoad offers OpenHire, a recruiting and ATS system. It offers recruiting access through social media channels, data security, and EEO compliance for mid-sized to large businesses. It is a component of SilkRoad’s Lifesuite product line.N/A
Pricing
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Features
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.4
Ratings
18% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.7
Ratings
8% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
Approval workflow8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Balance details9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.5
Ratings
16% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update personal information10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
Report builder10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
SilkRoad Recruiting
-
Ratings
New hire portal10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
-
Ratings
SilkRoad Recruiting
6.8
Ratings
16% below category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings3.70 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Small Businesses
Dayforce Powerpay
Dayforce Powerpay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Built for TeamsSilkRoad Recruiting
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are managing PTO for numerous employees, this program is the best. It is easy to read, easy to use and easy to maintain. The app is especially nice for our employees to check balances and to put in requests for time off from the road. There are probably more robust software solutions for extremely large organizations, but I really think the Built for Teams is one of the best out there.
Read full review
I think OpenHire is best for a small company (max about 2500 employees). The more employees you have the more HR people you should have and this can get expensive. I know most larger companies are using more advanced systems as well (Workday). During the selection process be sure to determine how many OpenHire users you would need. Ask whether your managers will be willing to work in the system as well or whether HR would have to own the entire process. If you are EEOC compliant, make sure you ask about diversity posting, APP tracking of applicants, and reporting needs. If you require an onboarding tool, SilkRoad offers RedCarpet. I found it to be very complex and hiring managers refused to use it. If you require an onboarding tool, definitely look into it. The demo may look great but there were a lot of implementation steps done to make it work and it just didn't fit our company culture. So make sure it fits yours.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to align budget with position
  • graphics creating
  • was easy to learn - I had no formal class in it and figured it out quickly
Read full review
  • The ease of use when it comes to create requisitions from a hiring managers side of things is definitely a positive. It's very much user intuitive and the specifications can be completely customized as to what a company would like to appear within said requisition.
  • Candidate correspondence is an absolute breeze as you can custom load templates into the system that can be edited at any time through an administrator in your company instead of having to go through a technical support team on the other side of things.
  • Overall, it's a pretty no muss no fuss system to use as there's not a great layer of complication about it and like most things, spaced practice and consistent exposure to it tend to iron out those rough edges. From an administration standpoint, adding in locations and hiring managers is incredibly simplistic along with reporting functionality.
  • Candidate folders have come a long way in the system and are much more user friendly at this point than when I began using the system some four years ago. It's very easy to shift candidate profiles between folders and edit on the fly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Our biggest problem has been integration with other packages. We still have to create or delete users in other systems. It would be nice to have automated integrations with those systems.
Read full review
  • We no longer use Silkroad largely because it caused me more work. There was no ability to make documents required in the application process. Although we said a resume, transcripts, a specific list of references and cover letter were required in the posting more than 90% of applications were missing something which forced me to correspond with thousands of applicants and wasted a lot of time.
  • They lack integrity. We were promised customer support for applicants when we purchased Silkroad but it was yanked about a year later. It wasted even more of my time and showed a lack of integrity on the part of the company.
  • It lacked some of the reporting we needed and every time we needed something special it was an extra cost.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It was a great solution for the company in all aspects, especially the cost. The company was not in a position to afford a solution such as Oracle PeopleSoft. The only reason we did not renew OpenHire was we got acquired by a much larger organization and started utilizing the tools that the parent company had available
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's not a bad system to use, there just seems to be so much click through to get one task achieved. Once you know all the little routes and pieces it gets easier.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support for Silkroad is awful. I know they are working on it and it seems to be slightly better but it's still not great. I have had multiple cases I have never heard from them on, others I have had to follow-up multiple times and one that took a year
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We use the program for different purposes. Justworks is good because it provides more services like payment tracking and information on insurance, compared to built for teams. But Built for Teams still has good use from an employee information perspective. That's why my company still uses both services though we could probably just use Justworks.
Read full review
OpenHire is not nearly as advanced as Kenexa and is probably more on par with iCIMS. I did find iCIMS had some additional functionality and was easier to use than OpenHire. OpenHire's system seems much more fragmented, requiring work arounds than either of the others. I also found iCIMS to have better customer service when in need of help using the system or requesting any changes. OpenHire was the selection at my previous company based on its global platform as well as cost savings. At my current company, OpenHire was selected prior to my joining, however, for the level of recruiting we do, the lack of sophistication isn't really an issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 100% employee satisfaction with the request. It's very easy to manage any request and approve.
  • Easy to monitor available time-off and PTO's. We cut down 80% of paperwork and wastage of labor hours in calculating what an individual has accrued for their vacation and PTO.
  • The best part is transparency between supervisor and team member on requests for late arrivals, early departures, or missing work by recording it in Built for Teams.
Read full review
  • OpenHire has very positively impacted our organization. It has allowed us to streamline our process and keep record of all of our recruitment electronically instead of in paper.
  • It has allowed us to have a consistent recruitment process in all of our countries
  • It has greatly increased the efficiency of our recruitment team.
  • Only negative is that our organization has an expectation for reports and we are not able to always give them what they would like out of the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Built for Teams Screenshots

Screenshot of Interactive org chart allows you to add and reposition people and entire teams.Screenshot of Recruiting and applicant tracking features make hiring a smooth and painless process.Screenshot of Employees have easy access to their PTO balances and history.Screenshot of Onboarding process helps new employees get up to speed quickly while ensuring compliance.Screenshot of Dashboards and reports keep executives and managers in-the-know.