Easy Projects is a project management tool designed for a wide range of businesses (small to mid-sized and enterprise level). It includes both basic features like creating projects and tasks and filling in the calendar, and also some advanced ones, including an interactive Gantt chart, an executive dashboard, time tracking and billing. It provides integration with MS Outlook, is customizable and has SaaS/On-Premise options.
$6
per month
Contractor Foreman
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$6
per month
Business
$12
per month
Platform
$19
per month
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Features
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Project & financial reporting
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
5.50 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.50 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
I think as a project management software, Easy Projects is great. We used spreadsheets before, and that led to a whole mess of confusion. Easy Projects gets everything in one place online -- you can access it from anywhere with an Internet connection and everyone is working off the same files. This works well for us as a marketing/graphic design group. Our colleagues in web design use it, as well, I'm told with success. So I know those two scenarios will work with the Easy Projects system. If you are selecting project management software, definitely know what you need a system to do in its most basic form -- then see what additional elements appeal to you. One thing you may want to investigate during your evaluation of Easy Projects is server space. We host this program and its files on an internal server, so we have to be sure there is enough space to accommodate open jobs and archive files.
Contractor Foreman works well for subcontractors and GC’s who don’t have the budget for higher-priced platforms (like Procore) but still need estimating, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and job costing in one system. For example, a 10–25 person construction company can replace separate tools (Excel, QuickBooks, text messaging, and whiteboard schedules) with Contractor Foreman and immediately improve organization and accountability.
Easy Projects is great for project management. It allows you to assign users, set tasks and end dates, and keep it all together in one working file/job. It's a project manager's dream -- you can look inside and see exactly what is going on and any missed deadlines.
Easy Projects allows good customization of the fields. We have worked it so that in a job file, we can enter info about things specific to publication design -- size, file format, delivery location, etc. And we've been able to change these further over time as our needs change.
Easy Projects allows for archiving of completed jobs. You don't have to see them every time you log in, but it's great to be able to go back and search through completed jobs (even several years back) to see what was done last time, who was assigning, costs, etc.
Easy Projects allows you to pull reports and export them. This has proved helpful when we needed an overall log of jobs for a client or to pull a large number of costs.
EP is great but could be better. EP has been a wonderful tool within our organization, it has helped us control expenses, resources, and the time needed to invest in each project, however when it comes to presenting reports and details it is a bit weak, there are more tools specialized in data visualization, and it would be good to make some kind of integration between EP and the other market alternatives
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
In my personal experience, I only needed EP support once and the truth is that they attended me very well and very quickly, they helped me with what I needed, it was a question regarding the use of WebServices, they solved my doubt and then they contacted me another agent to verify that everything was resolved and if they could help me with anything else
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Most project management systems are fairly the same, however, this would be better than monday.com in that it is more suited for project management professionals, and monday.com is more for anyone to use because it's more simple. This means Easy Projects are better equipped for the details needed to manage a project. The only drawback if you are a small group is that monday.com offers a free version where Easy Projects does not.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Increased team collaboration improved the results significantly, because we managed to reduce the amount of time wasted on unnecessary iterations, therefore reducing costs.
The reasonable pricing enabled us to enjoy the service we needed with with less impact on our budget than we've expected.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.