Beehire vs. Lever

Any organization with high turnover (regardless of the reason) or expanding operations could save countless managerial manhours with Beehire. It really simplifies the hiring process and takes a tremendous amount of minuscule tasks out of the equation for you. Operations with under 50 employees or with very low turnover would probably not benefit from this as much, though it is still a great tool when you have multiple hiring managers, especially if they are not co-located.

Incentivized

Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect

Incentivized

• Collecting applications systematically in an easy to sort fashion.
• Eliminating the need for rigorous reading to pre-qualify potential hires.
• Centralizing our applications so that multiple interviewers can work together.

Incentivized

• Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
• Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
• Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.

Incentivized

• When collecting big data becomes slow to operate.
• The storage of more date was not easy so is good to increase the storage capacity.
• The analysis of data was tiresome.

Incentivized

• It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
• The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
• If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.

Incentivized

It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!

What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...

It was easy to manage and collect data well.it uses a short time to operate which makes its work effective and easy to operate. The data modeling is well and easy. The storage of data becomes well and useful and easy while being good to operate. The platform performs well and is easy to understand.

Incentivized

I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.

Incentivized

• Reporting data is easily.
• The document management is easy and good.
• It takes short time to analyze the data.

Incentivized

• We have an ATS now and did not have one before
• LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
• Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
• Lots of frustration with post implementation support
• Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues