Beehire vs. Lever

The Beehire data management was good and well kept to enhance making data collection effective and data modeling easy while analyzing the data it takes short time and there is no use of energy. It uses less power and document management becomes well and good. It is kept well and takes short time.

Incentivized

I think Lever is great for any sized company, but especially strong for smaller, growing teams. It's a very simple system, but clean, sleek, and very useful in any scenario. They have great support whenever you need it so those with smaller HR or People teams could easily benefit from their help. Can't think of too many scenarios where Lever wouldn't be well-suited, but maybe once you grow to International growth and hiring, it may be better to have a more Enterprise style business, set up for larger scaling.

Incentivized

• Collecting applications systematically in an easy to sort fashion.
• Eliminating the need for rigorous reading to pre-qualify potential hires.
• Centralizing our applications so that multiple interviewers can work together.

Incentivized

• Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
• Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
• Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.

Incentivized

• When collecting big data becomes slow to operate.
• The storage of more date was not easy so is good to increase the storage capacity.
• The analysis of data was tiresome.

Incentivized

• [In my experience,] terrible customer support - pay more to get less...
• Integrations are spotty and can break without reason
• Lever has so much potential, but their Roadmap is lacking in ways that will really help customers succeed
• Focuses on the number of candidates and not the company's need to build talent in a cost effective, data driven and collaborative way
• Overpromised and underdelivered in [the] capability of the tool. [I believe that you should] not trust your sales team.

It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!

What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...

It was easy to manage and collect data well.it uses a short time to operate which makes its work effective and easy to operate. The data modeling is well and easy. The storage of data becomes well and useful and easy while being good to operate. The platform performs well and is easy to understand.

Incentivized

Lever is comparable to Greenhouse in its basic recruiting functions. I have found it to be WAY better than Bullhorn (clunky and overly-complicated with a very dated and non-intuitive interface) and Jazz HR (slick and pretty, but limited in its functions). The best ATS I've used is the proprietary tool at Meta, but alas, that tool is for internal use only

Incentivized

• 30% increase on new-hire satisfaction surveys.
• We met our summer staff quota three weeks earlier than projected with far less effort and stress.
• For hires who may apply again next year, we have a concise catalog from which to review every aspect of the hiring process from the previous year, which will undoubtedly save tremendous time and effort.

Incentivized

• Lever provides an enormous ROI by getting us in front of the right candidates that are going to make us more money and more successful as an org.
• I think that both the quality and quantity of new hires has gone up ever since we started using lever and involving the entire org in the process.
• It also saves us a lot of time because we don't need to send referrals via email, while saving/attaching resumes and such.

Incentivized