Azure Logic Apps vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Cortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Features
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.5
Ratings
6% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
1. For simple tasks / moderately difficult tasks (where there are not too many condition checks) 2. We have less time for development, and the Agenda is simple. 3. Avoid Azure Logic Apps when you are unsure about hitting the limits (check latest limitations of Azure Logic Apps in MS docs)
Read full review
XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
Read full review
Pros
  • We use it for an email connector to a function app and as a way to move items into a storage account.
  • We use it as a way to preprocess information before it goes into function app or a SharePoint site.
Read full review
  • Automation with immediate security responses.
  • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
  • Analysis and reporting feature.
  • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
  • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
  • Centralized monitoring.
Read full review
Cons
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
  • SAML is not stable, it gives a lot of issues.
  • Pre-defined playbooks need a lot of fine tuning
  • Lacks proper documentation
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
Read full review
Usability
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It was much easier than we all anticipated.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company Microsoft and we had nothing to worry about our data security. Also, Logic apps offered a great deal when it came to pricing and it was also so much easier to negotiate the plans and prices with the customer care representatives at Azure Logic Apps!
Read full review
The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
  • Reduces man-hours spent on handling false-positive repetitive alerts, daily 40% of analysts' time saved during a 24 hour period. In the initial stage, it was 75% of analysts' time saved due to the new environment, less maturity, and a lot of un-finetuned alerts.
  • Single pane for notification, collaboration, and action (to some extent) which is a major time saver compared to the conventional method of meeting invites and emails back-and-forth.
  • Secure documentation of business-critical incidents with a need-to-know basis of access according to each role.
Read full review
ScreenShots