Axcient x360Recover (formerly BRC) can not only recover a single server or desktop, but can automate the recovery of an entire customer site through its Virtual Office and automated Runbook features. In a disaster event, authorized users can log into the web application or Remote Management Console and create a virtual private cloud called a Virtual Office. The Virtual Office ensures security, privacy and reliability for every organization needing to run one or more failover virtual machines in…
N/A
Quest QoreStor
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
QoreStor facilitates the adoption of most storage types, uniquely including cloud object storage like native object storage. QoreStor’s advanced compression and deduplication algorithms aim to slash storage requirements and costs anywhere QoreStor is deployed, even in the cloud. QoreStor includes ransomware protection capabilities to protect backup data.
QoreStor replaces the Quest DR Series the former Dell / Quest backup and recovery solution, featuring data deduplication.
N/A
Pricing
Axcient x360Recover
Quest QoreStor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Axcient x360Recover
Quest QoreStor
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Axcient x360Recover
Quest QoreStor
Features
Axcient x360Recover
Quest QoreStor
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Axcient x360Recover
8.7
35 Ratings
7% above category average
Quest QoreStor
-
Ratings
Universal recovery
8.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instant recovery
8.935 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recovery verification
9.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business application protection
9.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations
7.230 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification
9.034 Ratings
00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud
8.834 Ratings
00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression
8.730 Ratings
00 Ratings
Snapshots
8.835 Ratings
00 Ratings
Flexible deployment
9.235 Ratings
00 Ratings
Management dashboard
8.335 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform support
8.635 Ratings
00 Ratings
Retention options
8.834 Ratings
00 Ratings
Encryption
9.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Axcient x360Recover
8.8
32 Ratings
4% above category average
Quest QoreStor
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection
8.926 Ratings
00 Ratings
Replication
9.130 Ratings
00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics
8.530 Ratings
00 Ratings
Malware protection
8.323 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities
9.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
I feel that Axcient x360Recover is well suited for any environment, both large and small. Weather you build your own device, BYOD or purchase one of theirs, it all works great. I even use it at home via the direct to cloud option. Well work the investment. I am unable to find a downside at this time.
The product can be run on-premises or in the cloud. It is a fantastic option to reduce the size and storage requirements of backup jobs. If your backup system can already produce a reliable reduction in storage up to 75% then I would say the QoreStor appliance would be irrelevant in your case. It does not perform backups itself. It is simply an extra step to reduce size, encrypt and offload backups to the cloud. this reduces the load on a backup system to handle other tasks while the QoreStor takes over.
The business continuity component for spinning up the desired recovery point as a virtual machine on the appliance in order to keep the business operational is rock solid.
Recovering the desired backup point back to the physical hardware or virtual environment and syncing the most recent changes to finalize the recovery is awesome.
The system documentation is concise and easy to use.
The only thing missing is the ability to cancel a backup as they appear to just continue to try to run even after rebooting the BDR and endpoint until a failure finally occurs.
The only other ask would be to expand support to Linux operating systems.
We've been using Axcient over the years and have worked with their development team to suggest new features, something that you would not normally be able to do with other companies. They listen to what we have to say and understand that we are a business, just like them. It's great to know that someone will always be there for you when you need them.
It is overall very easy to install and get working. Install the application, select the drives you want to backup or leave blank and backup all drives. It starts to run immediately. You configure all the backup retention and how often to run in the portal so once you deploy the agent it is very easy to get started. After the backup completes. The portal will perform a test boot and auto verification of the image.
Issues with failing backups drag out for months at a time. Axcient hardware replacements are quick to be suggested by support but as the issues are most often with the software architecture this almost never helps. Support often uses their access to the appliance as a back door into customer environments without our consent and despite our repeated complaints, accessing our customers servers and executing disruptive diagnostics like chkdsk in the middle of production hours for that customer environment. More recently they've been blaming their frequent off-site transfer failures on our customer's firewalls (of all makes and models) and insisting that the only possible resolution is to increase the TCP session timeout dangerously high (multiple hours), putting every client environment at substantial disk of even accidental Denial of Service attacks. Talking to any two support individuals, even when escalated all the way to their development team, often yields entirely different and contradictory answers regardless of the problem.
The support team is the main reason I am sticking to Quest/KACE products. They are stellar to work with and always responsive when I need help. The team listens to the user's recommendations for added features and tends to add the ones that really have merit. Support is everything when it comes to working with such a company
I had the miss fortune to go back to this device. Alot has changed since the first time I had used it. Now instead a full deployable network appliance, you have to download a preconfigured virtual machine that will only run on an ESXi server. What about Hyper-V? I have many clients that are Hyper-V only. I setup a test lab to get this thing up and running and it has been a nightmare to say the least. Will be looking at other options.
Security and encryption of Axcient is a top priority . Axcient have all the tools to provide solutions to different kind of businesses Best part is it has an MSP friendly console to manage multiples devices and clients at the same Dashboard. Deployment process is very easy in Windows an VMWare Devices.
When I evaluated the Dell system it was an entirely new server on-site, with licensed levels of inlocking the storage it had on board. For a smaller organization, the Dell system was not cost-effective with a large upfront payment, and additional hardware to manage on-site. The QoreStor system was a virtual machine that could pop into my current system and just use allocated storage already in place. In addition, the upfront cost was dramatically less than the Dell option and no additional hardware