AWS Batch vs. Azure Batch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Batch
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
With AWS Batch, users package the code for batch jobs, specify dependencies, and submit batch jobs using the AWS Management Console, CLIs, or SDKs. AWS Batch allows users to specify execution parameters and job dependencies, and facilitates integration with a broad range of popular batch computing workflow engines and languages (e.g., Pegasus WMS, Luigi, Nextflow, Metaflow, Apache Airflow, and AWS Step Functions).N/A
Azure Batch
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Azure Batch is cloud-scale job scheduling and compute management.N/A
Pricing
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Features
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
AWS Batch
7.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Azure Batch
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Score 6.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS BatchAzure Batch
Likelihood to Recommend
Start with reviewing all your jobs, consolidating the timeline, and making a plan on what all jobs need to be prioritized. These can be optimized based on cost and performance. With a continuously changing workload, AWS Batch helps to build and automate the jobs across various resources. It also helps to manage the performance and workload.
Read full review
Azure is specifically suited for businesses that work with customers that need to work with Microsoft software products. Any instances of Microsoft products or suites that require an environment test to set up would definitely benefit from this tool. As an IT support, it is relatively easy to support and use. Where this tool is not useful if a customer has no need for it.
Read full review
Pros
  • S3 amount of files
  • Easy to share files to other sites
  • Like that the files and folders can be open and public or completely private
  • I like that you can have double or mirroring in different Data Centers for Data Recovery
Read full review
  • Managing the users
  • Having multiple environments
  • Creating multiple groups
Read full review
Cons
  • Jobs monitoring dashboards are not matured
  • Documentation and support is something which can be improved
  • Sometime i faced the slow response or slow in performance i would say
Read full review
  • The user interface, in my opinion, might need further clarification.
  • Any situation where a user's password has to be reset would benefit from this feature.
  • Any accounts that were accidentally established more than once may be transferred over quickly and easily.
Read full review
Usability
Key advantages include cost-effectiveness through dynamic resource provisioning and the use of spot instances. It auto-scales to meet workload demands, allowing easy job submission via the AWS Management Console or SDKs. It integrates seamlessly with other services like S3 and CloudWatch. It features automatic retries for failed jobs. It allows for a custom computing environment tailored to specific needs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CF did not have a way to store the videos and I did not want to do so in YouTube because of privacy reasons.
Read full review
Both are excellent resources that successfully deliver the promised benefits. Two rival businesses, each with its own distinct culture and set of goals. As far as IT assistance goes, I find Azure's user interface to be slightly more intuitive. Both resources are valuable and have their advantages and disadvantages. Both are crucial if you run a fast-paced business with a large consumer base.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well compared to the cost of having multiple lambda's or some other custom solution working, it has has a postiive impact
  • Helped in orchestrating the jobs, has saved time of developers
Read full review
  • After initial setup, we now have significantly less time spent processing data.
  • The automation of data formatting and display after processing is exciting because it frees us to focus on the data itself.
  • Since using Batch, we have significantly decreased the number of items we previously utilized.
Read full review
ScreenShots