ESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.
N/A
Pricing
athenaClinicals
ESO EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaClinicals
ESO EHR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
athenaClinicals
ESO EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of athenaClinicals and ESO Electronic Health Record
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
ESO Electronic Health Record
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Claims management
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Coding
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient billing
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial Reporting
7.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of athenaClinicals and ESO Electronic Health Record
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.2
8 Ratings
4% above category average
ESO Electronic Health Record
-
Ratings
Rule-based scheduling
7.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in
8.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-location support
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Calendar interface
8.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of athenaClinicals and ESO Electronic Health Record
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.9
9 Ratings
20% above category average
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.3
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Charting / document management
8.99 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Templates
8.99 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Patient portal
10.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
8.47 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Fax integration
9.99 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.69 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Workflow automation
8.89 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Speech recognition
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
7.29 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
E-prescribing
9.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of athenaClinicals and ESO Electronic Health Record
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.4
9 Ratings
1% above category average
ESO Electronic Health Record
9.5
1 Ratings
13% above category average
HIPAA compliance
8.39 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
9.99 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
8.39 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
7.08 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of athenaClinicals and ESO Electronic Health Record
Works well for family med and peds primary care. Would not be well suited to wound healing/hyperbaric medicine practice in current configuration as the specific documentation requirements of wound management and hyperbaric treatments don't mesh well with the layout and forms that I observed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Quality programs - able to see what measures are outstanding for the patient
Reporting - able to report on multiple financial reports as well as clinical information
Standardization of clinical information - the system forces users within the same specialty to use the same templates (as a starting point), therefore it is easier to standardize protocols and treatments of care
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The schedule needs to be improved. You should be able to see the schedule in a day, a week , in a month view and be able to schedule directly from the schedule.
It's difficult to name items because they are traditionally corrected very quickly
The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info