Atera is presented as an Agentic AI platform for IT management, that offers a digital workforce of AI agents that proactively and autonomously support entire IT operations. Atera’s all-in-one IT management platform consolidates RMM, helpdesk, ticketing, and automation, so IT teams and MSPs can manage and protect infrastructure, automate tasks, and boost service quality by reducing downtime and improving SLAs. Atera has shifted focus from automation to AI-powered autonomy in IT. With…
$129
per month (billed annually) per user
CA Unicenter NSM (Discontinued)
Score 3.1 out of 10
N/A
Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Unicenter NSM) from CA Technologies reached end of life (EOL) in 2015.
N/A
Pricing
Atera
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
MSP - Pro
$129
per month (billed annually) per user
IT Department - Professional
$149
per month (billed annually) per user
MSP - Growth
$179
per month (billed annually) per user
IT Department - Expert
$189
per month (billed annually) per user
MSP - Power
$209
per month (billed annually) per user
IT Department - Master
$219
per month (billed annually) per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atera
CA Unicenter NSM (Discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Unlimited devices.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atera
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
Features
Atera
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Atera
10.0
Ratings
31% above category average
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Virtualization monitoring
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Atera
9.4
Ratings
24% above category average
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
25% below category average
Remote monitoring
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network device monitoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Activity Monitoring
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Atera
8.9
Ratings
18% above category average
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Patch Management
8.20 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Policy-based automation
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service configuration management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Software and hardware inventory
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
Atera
7.8
Ratings
14% above category average
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Attended device access
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Unattended device access
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile device access
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Virtual device access
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple-display support
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple concurrent sessions
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Atera
-
Ratings
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
5.5
Ratings
32% below category average
Performance data reports
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Customizable reporting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Data visualization
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Risk analysis
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Atera
-
Ratings
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
2.0
Ratings
104% below category average
Antivirus and malware management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atera
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
CA Unicenter Network and Systems Management (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Atera is doing well in the monitoring part as it is informing the real time ping of running devices and if any device goes down, it is informing us on the real time. It is helping us to monitor the last reboot status, current logged in users, time zone, IP addresses and other things so that we can track our end devices status. In the patching part Atera is pathing our all devices with the notification stating user to restart device at their convenient time. It is also patching our third party applications. It is good in installing and uninstalling of the third party application but limited to availability in the Atera inventory. Atera is not good in some parts such as in the patching part of applications, sometime it fails to update all 3rd party applications that were not installed via Atera. It is not good if you have to transfer a file to multiple systems at the same time.
It's a decent system if you're a pure IT shop and want to become ITIL-aligned. It forces everyone into an ITIL mentality - service level agreements, change management, and asset tracking. It's very rote, for better and for worse. It's not appropriate at all as a customer-facing or non-IT facing self-service tool. You will never get your end users to really understand how to use the interface.
As of right now, we have found nothing that can offer as many features as Atera does along with the affordability. They are doing monthly releases each month and not just making small changes (shared scripting library, chocolatey support, Install packages, Splashtop SOS support, Scheduled tickets to name a few). The uptimes are great and accessibility to the dashboard has yet to be limited. We are a happy customer and bordering on fanboy status now
Atera has a user-friendly interface that improves navigation. Support staff can quickly access real-time alerts and remote devices and manage tickets without much training. Atera’s usability has positively impacted our organization by increasing operational efficiency and improving response times to resolve issues.
Atera support provides answers to my questions lightning fast. They have never left me feeling like I'm out there on my own. I can ask questions by email, or by chat, or by opening a ticket with them and they are always on it quickly. They also have a forum where other Atera users can help you if you need it, and you can also add feature requests via the forum.
We have to hire 2 full-time 3rd-party consultants to run this application. That tells me it's not a very IT-friendly, vendor-supported application. Compare that with, say, SolarWinds, which is much easier for regular IT staff to customize without sacrificing features and capability. Sure, we have to bring in Loop1 to consult for us when we need to do a major SolarWinds config change or need a really unusual custom query built, but we never need more than 10 hours of consulting per month.
Atera is well designed for remote monitoring and management purposes. The other tools, such as ManageEngine Endpoint Central, are more focused on managing the endpoints and applications, such as installation or removal of applications, and blocking or whitelisting applications. Atera is well structured for core monitoring and management purposes. It works like a well designed monitoring tool and at the same time works as a well designed management tool. Price point of Atera is very low as compared to other applications and the main part is that it does not cost you for the number of devices it covered, instead it will cost you on the basis of admin licenses you have. You can have one license and under that you can manage thousands of devices. Apart from this, Atera has a lot of tools that are integrated with it, and they are really useful.
I did not select CA. If it were up to me, I would migrate us to ServiceNow. The user interface on ServiceNow is 100% more modern and 200% more user friendly. With ServiceNow, the front page for end users makes it clear: one button that says "Ask for something" and one button that says "Report a problem". That's what our end users need. The biggest problem we have in our organization is that our end users don't report issues to the Help Desk often enough and rarely ask for things through the Help Desk. A clean, simple self-service option like this would open up a world of new information for our customer service team.
It was integral during our large IT consolidation 10 years ago in merging 10 different IT departments into one by converging on one ticketing system for all IT issues.
Its lack of user-friendliness has gated us from being able to deploy a true self-service IT help desk.