Arcserve UDP vs. Barracuda Message Archiver

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcserve UDP
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Arcserve Unified Data Protection (UDP) is designed to future-proof infrastructure by delivering data protection and disaster recovery for every type of workload. Backed by heterogeneous, image-based technology that protects to and from any target, the vendor boasts combining enterprise-ready features without the complexity of traditional enterprise solutions. Arcserve UDP supercedes the former Zetta DataProtect backup and recovery solution from Zetta.net, acquired by Arcserve July…N/A
Barracuda Message Archiver
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
The Barracuda Message Archiver is designed to help organizations reduce email storage requirements, meet demanding compliance requirements, and address e-discovery requests easily and effectively. Integration with the Barracuda Cloud provides long-term email storage and backup.N/A
Pricing
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Best Alternatives
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arcserve UDPBarracuda Message Archiver
Likelihood to Recommend
Midscale infrastructure where a simple and easy to configure and use backup solution is needed to protect workloads on-prem or in the cloud workloads. If you don't want to keep your backups on-prem, you can have them in the cloud.
Read full review
For every company which is too big for MailStore. MailStore is much cheaper and easier...so mostly enough for 5 to 20 people companies. But for all bigger companies with 200 plus users it is the right solution. Please be sure, that it is not easy to get it running. But when it runs, it is mostly stable.
Read full review
Pros
  • Stability of agents
  • Flexibility (able to load on low-end hardware in a pinch)
  • Reliability of backed up data
Read full review
  • easy implementation
  • retention policies in the archive
  • integration on the client.
Read full review
Cons
  • Still a nich player
  • It has taken long to mature and evolve but they are on the way.
  • Dedup is not the best.
  • Not a SaaS solution.
Read full review
  • In Archiving there should be a "Header only" download for users with offline stores.
  • Single sign-on in WebClient.
  • Single sign-on in Outlook Add-In.
  • More performance to the boxes.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It is that easy. Set and forget and everything is just working.
Read full review
Usability
It works great in our infrastructure, we have reduced the risk of losing information at a lower TCO compared to other solutions. The implementation process was precise and fast and upgrades have always been smooth. It delivers what it promises.
Read full review
The product is good but for this specific product there are often some technical problems. Mostly support in Vienna can solve them soon. The development is very, very slow. I have asked for some changes. They gave the okay to make it with a feature request...but 3 years later there is still no code for my problems. Not even one feature request was done.
Read full review
Support Rating
Pretty good--I haven't actually had to call them much so it's hard to say. The box works well enough and most of my issues have been related to the rest of my network, rather than the appliance itself.
Read full review
The support in Vienna is very, very great. They are fast and can support almost all problems by themselves. Especially Mr. Michael Holzer is a very high specialist and you can ask him almost everything. Just write a mail to emeasupport and you will be sure, that some minutes or hours later you will get a kind and professional call.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Think about using offline archives. They make a lot of trouble. Better train your users to use the Outlook Addin Search without using offline archives, which need a lot of power, network and harddrive space. Headers only functionality was promised years ago but is still not implemented.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Arcserve [UDP] has stood the test of time due to its low cost-to-feature value proposition for our company. We have ultimately decided to move to a more MSP-friendly product in N-Able Backup, but Arcserve [UDP] kept us around for years with their reliable and inexpensive product that delivered above and beyond technologically of their competitors throughout all that time.
Read full review
For us it is important that it is stable. Because of this we thought it is a good idea to buy a clustered station. Barracuda can do this and we bought 2 1050 boxes and linked them. At the end the price was also okay...we also evaluated Symantec and at the end both were candidates but Barracuda made better price.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved our bacon on one occasion restoring a business critical CRM SQL database
  • Granular Email restore a massive boon
Read full review
  • Long term archiving is good.
  • Integrating of many PSTs cost extra money for PST Enterprise. This should be included.
Read full review
ScreenShots