aqua cloud vs. Atlassian Jira

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
aqua cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
aqua cloud is an AI-powered test management system designed specifically for regulated industries and big enterprises that aims to help to accelerate audit processes and speed up releases.N/A
Atlassian Jira
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Atlassian Jira is a project management tool, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
$9
per month per user
Pricing
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Editions & Modules
aqua cloud
Contact Us
per month per user
aqua enterprise cloud
custom price quote
Standard
$9
per month per user
Premium
$17
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*plus 20% for Maintenance & SupportHigher volume teams may qualify buyers for a discount.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Features
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
aqua cloud
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Atlassian Jira
-
Ratings
Centralized test management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
aqua cloud
-
Ratings
Atlassian Jira
9.5
Ratings
22% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
aqua cloud
-
Ratings
Atlassian Jira
9.8
Ratings
26% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
aqua cloudAtlassian Jira
Likelihood to Recommend
1. I used this to do test cases, wherein I got the results with visuals. I explained to clients very well with the visual examples as well. 2. Even I was very new to this tool, it gave me the best company. Even while integrating components as a beginner. 3. Even if I have got any bugs in test cases, it helped me to resolve in a better way. Happy user me! Thanks Aqua ALM.
Read full review
Jira facilitates software development, bug tracking, and sprints. It's ideal for structured workflows, issue management, and customer communication. However, more straightforward tools might be more efficient for highly creative, unstructured tasks or tiny, agile teams with quick visual overviews. Jira's complexity can be overkill for basic task lists.
Read full review
Pros
  • Writing test case and use case
  • Visuals
  • Very easy to create complex logs in the test case
Read full review
  • As a developer, it is easy to create, track and manage tickets efficiently.
  • Customizable issue types (eg: Bug, Task, Story, Epic) allow teams to categorize and priorizate work.
  • Great text editor and markdown support for detailed issue descriptions.
  • Assign issues to team members, set due dates and define priorities.
  • Integration with Jenkins, GitHub and other CI/CD tools to automate builds and deployments.
Read full review
Cons
  • I did not find automation of test in this tool, which I did it manually while doing test case
  • Apart from that I did not find anything bad in this tool, looks good
  • NA
Read full review
  • The interface is not intuitive to learn for new users
  • JQL is similarly challenging for newbies
  • It's possible to accidentally move issues from one sprint to another without realizing your mistake
  • Certain issue attributes aren't available in certain view (e.g. story points from the epic overview)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
JIRA is highly integrated into our organization. Nearly every department uses it, and many have multiple JIRA projects set up to track different types of work. We rolled out JIRA in a staged manner, but it continued to be adopted by more and more people and departments because it continues to show results. I expect we will continue to renew our JIRA license for years to come
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Atlassian Jira is relatively easy to use, but there are several ways to configure it, which can make it more complicated if you configure it incorrectly. Keeping the customizations and complexity limited to being the project would be suggested to ensure you don't lose in-built Atlassian Jira features, then change the configuration as you find things aren't meeting your exact needs.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Did not face any issues and whenever they plan maintanance they update all of us very well in advance also so in that view we are good with the product stability.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Performance is really good though it holds lot of data it loads quickly especially search operation also get the results very quickly as needed hence its good
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have not had a chance to contact JIRA's customer support. It does offer extensive documentation, although it often feels too technical for me. There is also a JIRA training app that lets you take little lessons and quizzes on different areas (e.g., JIRA basics, agile). I did find it a helpful way to teach myself.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Had received training from our own internal user so it was good and also very easy to understand topics and many tasks in the UI are self explanatory and we can do by our own
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I use aqua ALM for test cases. It has got the integration with Jira. Best thing is it will surely very well connect the organization in only one hub. I will perform test case, use cases.It has got open-source & many tools in one platform. Aqua ALM will our organization to manage, plan and to execute the use cases incidents in clear manner, it also fetches the reports which we give input. By this, we will also download the FLOW reports, visual diagrams. Happy clients! They appreciated my project.
Read full review
Jira is more feature-rich than Trello and also has better integration with other tools. Trello is a lot more focused on work tracking, while Jira can do a lot more than that. Both can also be combined, although they're often considered mutually exclusive alternatives—I've seen cases where companies choose to use either one or the other, but I haven't met an actual case of a company using both.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Atlassian Jira is highly stable and good with its performance and its has all the required scalability features as business needs
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Once I was working on my project's use case incident, I wanted the result to get in tree view, but I didnt get. Visuals I got, not which is the one I wanted. Anyways I explained the same to clients. so I would highly like the AQUA team to improve this.
  • I really wanted to appreciate that bug reporting in use case incidents. Very good!
  • In one of the projects I wanted to work in the FLOW DIAGRAM VISUAL. I got the excellent result in this. Thank you again :)
Read full review
  • JIRA has increased the teams' productivity and efficiency; the sprint timelines have improved by 15-20%.
  • JIRA's integration with tools like Bitbucket and Confluence has improved functional collaboration, leading to faster decision-making and issue resolution by approximately 10-15%.
  • Additional functionality requires additional third-party plugins, which require additional costs; the requirements of these plugins increase the costs by approximately 15%.
Read full review
ScreenShots

aqua cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Custom fields to provide additional information and make SDLC more comprehensive and efficientScreenshot of Change tracking in tickets that show when they happened.Screenshot of Screenshot of Activity tracking for teams, with changes in 2 levels:

1) Global (System level)

Displays actions in the system: who reset passwords, changes the roles or licenses, adds a member to a project.

2) Local (Project/folder level)

Tracks who makes changes to the organization and the structure of projects or foldersScreenshot of A customized data-bound report. These contain a broad set of tools to construct report layouts.Screenshot of Role assignment for team members. Enables multiple permissions for them to perform certain tasks.