Allstacks vs. Azure DevOps Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Allstacks
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Allstacks uses machine learning models to analyze SDLC data for delivery risks and projected outcomes for engineering leaders. The value stream intelligence platform illuminates insights across projects and tools so users can build better processes, create a better culture, and shape better outcomes for a business and its customers. Allstacks gathers and analyzes past work data and behavior from the tools a team is already using, like Jira, GitHub, and Bitbucket. The vendor states…N/A
Azure DevOps Services
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System) is an agile development product that is an extension of the Microsoft Visual Studio architecture. Azure DevOps includes software development, collaboration, and reporting capabilities.
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Pricing
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Azure Artifacts
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Basic Plan
$6
per user per month (first 5 users free)
Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted
$15
per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted
$40
per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
Basic + Test Plan
$52
per user per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Best Alternatives
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AllstacksAzure DevOps Services
Likelihood to Recommend
Our teams are now well equipped to communicate to the management with more transparency and clarity. All teams have improved their conversations. Managers are able to monitor the teams real time KPIs and identify any concerns immediately. We have been able to avoid many timeline delays. we do not miss any areas in our processes as we did before. The "helicopter" view on the entire process is highly valued.
Read full review
ADO is well suited for the visibility of day-to-day tasks and responsibilities as well as things such as Features, user stories, etc. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any scenario where it might not be well suited, as you can customize ADO to your liking to a degree.
Read full review
Pros
  • Team efficiency matrix tracking.
  • Track the progress of test cases.
  • Allocate excess resources if needed.
Read full review
  • Flexible Requirements Hierarchy Management: AZDO makes it easy to track items such as features or epics as a flat list, or as a hierarchy in which you can track the parent-child relationship.
  • Fast Data Entry: AZDO was designed to facilitate quick data entry to capture work items quickly, while still enabling detailed capture of acceptance criteria and item properties.
  • Excel Integration: AZDO stands out for its integration with MS Excel, which enables quick updates for bulk items.
Read full review
Cons
  • UI can be rigid but is constantly improving
  • User Management is the biggest opportunity for improvement
Read full review
  • Need to make the changes so that it doesn't occupy most of the CPU utilization and memory
  • Execution of Bulky SQl Queries leads to either the SQl being out of exception or the VS being unresponsive
  • Integration with Microsoft products is easy, but with non-Microsoft products it is more difficult, and you have to make a lot of configuration changes to integrate
  • With every upgrade of the Visual Studio, like from VS 2010 to VS 2013 , we need to upgrade our hardware/machine, as the VS hardware requirement also increases
  • If code is getting compiled in one visual studio, like in VS 2010, that the same code could possibly give an error when compiled in VS 2013, due to certain changes in keyword, data format, etc., with the VS upgrade
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Azure DevOps is a powerful, complex cloud application. As such there are a number of things it does great and something where there is room for improvement. One of those areas would be in usability. In my opinion it relies too much on search. There is no easy way to view all projects or to group them in a logical way. You need to search for everything.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Was not part of the process.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The detailed metrics which are shown when a software is deployed using pipeline is one of the greatest feature which overpowers GitLab.It has a very simple UI which allows easier creation of pipeline with all the required stages.
Read full review
Jira is fantastic for project management and customer facing portal. It is not good for pure development (no integration with Git, pipeline management, automated testing features). If DevOps were to integrate and adopt the project features of Jira as well as the customer facing interfaces, I feel it would be a complete project management system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's painful that jira items don't automatically get pulled in to allstacks
  • Would be great to have the data refresh a little more frequent
Read full review
  • Increased dev team efficiency through more streamlined development processes and task automation.
  • Improved quality of software deployments due to better source control, automated testing, and release management options available in DevOps.
  • Better collaboration between the dev team, business analysts, and agile project managers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Allstacks Screenshots

Screenshot of