Allo vs. Microsoft Teams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Allo
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Allo is a remote workspace made for asynchronous communication and remote teams. With interactive and visual spaces, teams are able to collaborate around, strategy, design, proposals, initiatives, and processes. This is done with Allo's interactive spaces. Allo includes: Creating interactive documents consisting of images, graphics, diagrams, text, and video Previewing documents and PDF's Previewing Microsoft Office documents Editing Google Suite…
$12
per month
Microsoft Teams
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Pricing
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Editions & Modules
Team
$12
per month
Enterprise
Custom
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts for annual subscriptions , as well as startups and educational institutions.Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Features
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Allo
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Teams
4.7
Ratings
48% below category average
Task Management7.90 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Mobile Access8.70 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Search7.00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.40 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings3.70 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Allo
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Microsoft Teams
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Chat7.40 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Notifications6.70 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Allo
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
5.3
Ratings
39% below category average
Video files8.30 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Audio files8.70 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Document collaboration8.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Advanced security features7.00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive7.30 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Device sync8.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Versioning00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AlloMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Allo is extremely well suited for companies that share lots of internal documents and assets that could easily be grouped into boxes. We manage several projects so it makes sense for us to condense all of our documents that various team needs, by team and department with our clients.
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is ideal for organizations where employees regularly collaborate by sharing files, working on the same documents, updating the progress, etc. This is because different file formats are supported for online editing and collaboration with the help of Microsoft Teams. Additionally, for every file which is shared among the team members, emails are not sent again and again which helps in easily managing and organizing files. It is less appropriate where the team members have to instantly reply to an urgent task as sometimes the notifications are not sent properly which may lead to a delay in the work.
Read full review
Pros
  • team's report at Weekly Huddle
  • designing new teaching aids
  • collaboration on writing textbooks
Read full review
  • Video calls are great with Microsoft Teams. They've made big improvements over the last year and I rarely have issue with getting on. It's nice when things just work.
  • The most used functionality is, of course, the chat feature. It does what it's supposed to do and you can create chat groups from whoever you'd like. We use it a lot when there is a special project and a team from various groups get together for a short period of time to get things done.
  • An overlooked function is the ability to search anything within Microsoft Teams. Any photo, document, or chat can be searched and found pretty easily. I can't tell you how many times this has saved me from having to rewrite something or start over.
Read full review
Cons
  • could introduce more features down the line to improve the service
  • offer more templates for a user to be able to use
  • offline functionality could be improved. Tends to be slow.
Read full review
  • I sometimes have a hard time viewing both the meeting screen and chat window at the same time.
  • There have been times when someone in a meeting will totally lose their connection.
  • At times the sound quality is not what it should be which makes it hard to hear each other.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The overall functionality of the product is incredible in that it provides a one-stop solution for organization and communication. The product is also very well integrated into Microsoft Outlook and other Office apps. Visually pleasing and very easy to use interface. New features are constantly being added to enhance the user experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support is quick to respond and assist with any issue or question
Read full review
I think Microsoft Team is overall good application for communication, track Project work inter the teams and also intra teams. I have 7 out of 10 because it needs improvements in certain features like video sharing call, call drop, audio quality and connecting problems even after having good internet connection.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Miro is a direct competitor for Allo. It has more features and integrations but Allo appeals much more to us because of the easy-to-navigate and elegant interface, as well as speed. Infinity is an all-in-one project management app. It's ideal for detailed project management and keeping tracts of tasks (and other. items) but Allo is much better for designing and brainstorming.
Read full review
We chose primarily because of the promised integration with the Microsoft Business Suite - which it mostly delivers on. That does give Teams an obvious advantage over competitors. IMHO Teams has a richer, more mature feature set, and the experience is more reliable and stable. Although like any of there there is room for imporvement.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • helps improve and maintain productivity
  • The windows app keeps the cpu very busy so can slow other application
  • team collaboration has been improved since using this program
Read full review
  • User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful.
  • MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organisational communications. This in turn has a positive impact on the overall business outcome.
  • Scheduling meetings have never been so easy in the past. We can schedule meetings on the go without any hassles
  • Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
ScreenShots