Alchemer (formerly SurveyGizmo) is an online survey tool that helps companies design surveys and collect and analyze data. Features include branding, logic & branching, mobile surveys, question types, and reporting.
$55
per month per user
SnapSurveys
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Snap Surveys offers both Survey Software and Feedback Management Solutions, including desktop survey software, online feedback management solutions, and survey research services. Snap Surveys offers complete tools for survey design, administration, data collection, and analysis. Snap Surveys supports all survey modes, including: Online, Mobile (including iPad/iPhone/Android), Paper, Kiosk, Phone, Scanning, and Tablet PC, in any language with robust analysis and reporting capabilities,…
$695
per year
Pricing
Alchemer
SnapSurveys
Editions & Modules
Collaborator
$55
per month per user
Professional
$165
per month per use (maximum 3 users)
Full Access
$275
per month per user (maximum 3 users)
Enterprise and Business
Contact for quote
Online/Mobile
$695
per year
Paper Scanning
$2,395
per year
Paper Scanning - Perpetual License
3,995
Online/Mobile - Perpetual License
5,995
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alchemer
SnapSurveys
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual billing on small team plans.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alchemer
SnapSurveys
Considered Both Products
Alchemer
No answer on this topic
Snap Surveys
Verified User
Chose SnapSurveys
It is an in between option. The options we evaluated were Qualtrics and SurveyGizmo. It's cheaper than Qualtrics and easier to design surveys than SurveyGizmo. Nonetheless it's not the worst option out there like SurveyMonkey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Alchemer
SnapSurveys
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
Feature
Alchemer
8.0
14 Ratings
0% above category average
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Survey templates
8.013 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Themes
7.014 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
9.013 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
Feature
Alchemer
9.3
15 Ratings
9% above category average
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
8.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Question design help
10.014 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Multiple question types
10.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
Feature
Alchemer
9.0
15 Ratings
9% above category average
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
3% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
9.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
Feature
Alchemer
6.6
15 Ratings
21% below category average
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Response tracking
7.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data export
6.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Standard reports
7.015 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom reports
8.014 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Analytics
5.013 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
Feature
Alchemer
10.0
13 Ratings
14% above category average
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Access controls
10.012 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance
10.012 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Alchemer and SnapSurveys
SurveyGizmo works extremely well as a platform for receiving survey responses. As a survey/business analytics tool, the platform offers extensive options for customization and deployment of professional questionnaires. Our team has found SurveyGizmo to be extremely well suited for the modern administrative employee. Surveys are relatively easy to create, deploy, and manage responses in real time. Furthermore, monitoring / managing the results enables businesses to provide any necessary follow-up based on key results. Our team spends quite a bit of time testing out survey tools and have found SurveyGizmo to be a solid option for the needs of our team. Furthermore, we have recommended the platform to other departments within our organization that have uniquely different skillsets from our own. Overall, we see SurveyGizmo as a tool that can be used across most organizational teams if implemented with the specific user-experience in mind.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it is very important to go through their training videos and user guides. Devote the time to learning it correctly from the beginning. In the long run you will enjoy it much more than plowing right into it and then trying to find out if you did it right. Also, while you are not required to buy the annual maintenance contract, I think if you are going to use the program, don't skimp, buy the annual maintenance contract. The free technical support is necessary, especially when you are up against deadlines.
Attaching images! Survey Gizmo makes attaching images from surveys a breeze. I've tried other popular survey tools and it can be difficult for users to submit images as part of their survey (e.g. some only allow 1 picture per question, whereas Survey Gizmo allows a range for you to select from)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Duplicate protection needs improvement. Anyone who would like to start a survey and finish at a later time is unable to which limits total survey responses.
Password protection option can be a challenge when uploading spreadsheets with pre-populated data.
Logic and piping options for questions can be difficult when designing more complicated and in-depth surveys, which requires a lot of testing.
Follow-up surveys do not provide an option for survey takers to review their previous survey responses, which may provide less accurate data when comparing individuals across multiple surveys.
Would like the option to link surveys together in order to more easily track data from individuals across multiple surveys and save previous survey data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The feature sets, agility, and flexibility remain approachable and incredibly powerful. Support is also very responsive and top notch. Overall, with a bit of basic foundational skills, there are seemingly an unlimited number of use cases for which Alchemer can be leveraged.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think as an organization there is always room to grow, however, this application has really helped us with our dilemma with offline, online, and paper surveys. We are able to make our surveys fun and engaging and the interface for the person creating the survey is user-friendly. Customer service is very helpful if you need additional support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Every once in awhile, it is necessary to solicit support. On those occasions, support is extremely responsive and supportive. It has been my experience that [if] they can't walk you through the desired endpoint, they will take a look at your build and remedy for you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I liked the interface for SurveyGizmo much more than Qualtrics. You knew a question was adjusted in SurveyGizmo and wouldn't change, but with Qualtric's interface, you had to refresh the account several times sometimes to ensure the question would work appropriately. Also, with SG, there were a lot of easier capabilities, such as changing missing values in bulk, required questions in bulk, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is an in between option. The options we evaluated were Qualtrics and SurveyGizmo. It's cheaper than Qualtrics and easier to design surveys than SurveyGizmo. Nonetheless it's not the worst option out there like SurveyMonkey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info