Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Guardicore is a segmentation company, now part of Akamai since the late 2021 acquisition, aiming to displace legacy firewalls. The Guardiocre software-only approach is decoupled from the physical network to provide a faster alternative to firewalls. It is built for the agile enterprise that offers greater security and visibility in the cloud, data-center and endpoint.N/A
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Israeli company Tufin offers a firewall security management offering via the Tufin Orchestration Suite, including SecureApp for managing network connectivity, SecureChange network change automation, and SecureTrack multi-vendor and next-generation firewall management.N/A
Pricing
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Features
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
-
Ratings
Tufin Orchestration Suite
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Policy planning and rule management00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Device Discovery00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationTufin Orchestration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
This is the best possible solution for enterprise-level organizations where server counts will be in the thousands. To manage these and understand the communication can be very cumbersome without this tool. Ease of creation map zone and application-wise can be relaxing to OS teams and support teams as well. There is no limit to labeling schema of servers and it gives the freedom to do so.
Read full review
If there is any organization who is having more then 10-15 firewalls and from different vendors, Tufin Orchestration Suite can be best suited there as it can manage all the firewalls from one single pane of glass and push the policy, and get the Standard based compliance reports for the rules created on the firewalls.
Read full review
Pros
  • Network traffic flow within environment of organization.
  • Creating maps for visibility and drill down is a key feature.
  • Labelling of servers can be done via running script.
  • Alerts can be sensitized for the traffic not seen.
Read full review
  • If you set your zones correctly Tufin will create your network topology map.
  • You can find which object or rule you want easily for all firewalls in the network.
  • Tufin provides more features for Checkpoint.
Read full review
Cons
  • Limited support to legacy infrastructure.
  • Integration with third party is a bit tedious.
  • Awaiting support for Kubernetes in the next version.
Read full review
  • Tufin SecureChange needs to be more agnostic, easy to integrate with Service NOW
  • JSON payload identification for Tufin SecureChange while integrating it with SNOW
  • customization should be made more easy, like custom dashboarding
  • Tufin Orchestration Suite Professional services experience could be also improved overall - Taking more ownership
  • API calls to 3rd party tools should be more flexible
Read full review
Usability
The solution is deployed throughout the organization. Teams are working and integrating it with the help desk tool wherever required. Helps in identifying the network traffic flows in lateral movement and east and west as well. Allows policies by default and later fine-tuning to be done to narrow it and enforce blocking action. Exporting reports from the tool is easy and can be observed for any issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support has been available 24*7. It also depends on criticality but support is available. Also, the right expertise from the team helps in identifying the issue quickly and this helps in less production downtime if required. The ticket is resolved with RCA.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
1) No limit to labeling schema. 2) Ease of creating maps with respect to zone, environment, subnets, etc. 3) Ease of creating policies and publishing the same. 4) Deception 5) Integration with monitoring tool (grafana) 6) Changes in the agent can be considered if there are legacy systems, time-consuming but can be achieved with the right information.
Read full review
1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Blocking unwarranted traffic can really boost security of organization.
  • Alerts can be triggered to SIEM servers and help in timely action.
  • Need to be very careful before configuring and publishing block policies in the production environment.
Read full review
  • Tufin has helped increase firewall migration time letting us build new policies instead of migrating garbage in
  • Tufin helps to identify who changed what when so if a change impacts access Tufin can help find what change was made from a single location
  • Tufin has a great reporting feature - except for Palo Alto right now - that helps to review and audit policy, flagging overly permissive and shadow or partially shadow policies.
Read full review
ScreenShots