Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira vs. Craft.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
The world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…N/A
Craft.io
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Craft, from the company of the same name in Tel Aviv, is presented by the vendor as a better way for Product Managers to manage and plan their products in agile environment.N/A
Pricing
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Features
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
7.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Craft.io
-
Ratings
Task Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
10.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Craft.io
-
Ratings
Velocity Calculation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Notion
Notion
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
ProductPlan
ProductPlan
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
Roadmunk
Roadmunk
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraCraft.io
Likelihood to Recommend
Daily activity management by using various kind of boards is very helpful to start the day with. Also, Backlog management is very good so it helps to keep track on the prioritized items. This can be used for all kind of Scrum activities by the Scrum master even for the Story management too. Also, it provides the required hierarchy levels, artifacts, boards, and workflows as an application in Jira. There is nothing to be shared as less appropriate while using SAFe.
Read full review
Craft.io is well suited for medium to large digital product teams that have some experience with the tools and features of the agile and lean models. Users that are new to those methodologies can have some difficulties understanding the platform. It is less appropriate for small projects too. It's a great tool but I think you can shape a project management tool to your needs in theses cases and it will work better.
Read full review
Pros
  • Team's progress.
  • Risk Management.
  • Visual representations - Dashboards.
Read full review
  • 'Sync' usually works flawlessly in syncing my artboards to Invision. Once you set up the plugin, I can easily forget about tinkering with any of the settings - it just 'works'.
  • 'Library' is pretty great for generating a style guide from my design doc. Clicking one button makes magic happen, and creates a super succinct document for me to share between teammates and other teams.
  • 'Data' also works wonders when trying to approximate 'real' data into a static design. It turns the painful job of having to fill in designs with 'real-world' data a piece of cake. It helps me validate rough designs using an actual approximation of real content.
Read full review
Cons
  • it is not possible to plan if teams have different sprint length
  • zoom into one sprint and then also zoom out to have big picture
  • names of user stories are not good to read because of static big picture
Read full review
  • It has a great workflow, but it is very little customizable.
  • The tool is not so easy to use, so you have to take a time to get to know it.
Read full review
Usability
It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Responsive chat with founders to answer any questions you have.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
Read full review
Craft has a completely unique tool set that has functionality that really is not duplicated any where else in the industry. It cannot really be compared to any other tool I have had experience with, especially with the larger cloud infrastructure that Invision has built around their plugin and their platform.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • More transparency.
  • Better product decisions.
  • Saving time and resources.
  • Less critical dependencies.
Read full review
  • It was good for tying end-user feedback on the app store to feature requests and help justify investments.
Read full review
ScreenShots