Adobe Substance 3D Collection vs. magicplan

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Substance 3D Collection
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Substance 3D is a suite of apps that support 3D design, including texture assets and rendering tools. Workflows can connect to Adobe Creative Cloud apps.N/A
magicplan
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
magicplan is an app for home contractors used to create and share floor plans, field reports, and estimates, while in the field. This mobile and cloud software is used to capture interior spaces, and also assists in the planning, estimating, and scheduling of jobs for contractors.
$39.99
per month
Pricing
Adobe Substance 3D Collectionmagicplan
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Report
$39.99
per month
Estimate
$89.99
per month
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Substance 3D Collectionmagicplan
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details17% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
Adobe Substance 3D Collectionmagicplan
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe Substance 3D Collectionmagicplan
Likelihood to Recommend
It's great if you don't want to mess around trying fixes or subpar software. Adobe Substance 3D is the default, and it just works when you need it. From textures to complex materials, it gets the job done with no worries. It's really good for new users, because the new UI features they implemented simplify the software a lot, and the learning curve is gentle. It is well suited for game development, renders, and top-notch material creation. One of the main features we use is the creation of dynamic materials that have different colors on the edges. This is useful because it adds a lot of realism, for example, in metals.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Great performance
  • Excellent Adobe support
  • Fast and easy
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The substance painter is easy to use but its interface could be improved to be a bit more user friendly.
  • More assets can be added to stager, so visualize products better. Also AI workflow can be added for backplates.
  • Substance designer learning curve is very tough. Many people not able to grab it. It could be simplified.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The overall usability of substance stager and painter is quite easy. Many people will be able to use it without much prior experience. But designer is very complicated to learn and not many resources available for that. I think if they integrate the AI and provide better resources in the general interface, it could be a 10 on 10 in usability.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I am not able to enter in the list the most close to substance we used like instamat and pixplant. We used them as cheaper alternatives to substance, they have limited tools and dont provide full control and accessibility for what we need. Blender is good for creating materials using nodes and stuff but not upto the mark. There is always something missing. For the photoshop, there is no option to create textures on 3d, which makes it tedious. For the KeyShot its good and sometimes better than stager but the overall value in substance collection and the seamless integration with other apps is very good
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The library we create in the substance painter really helps us to save a lot of time for future projects. Drag and drop the materials and boom product is ready.
  • Stager cuts us the costs by saving us time on the feedbacks because of the better visualization we were able to provide at initial stages.
  • Designer didnt helped us much directly but somewhat useful as it comes with the package and it has great tools which might be costlier to buy separately.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots