ActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Automation allows the user to design, build and run automation applications and services on any cloud, using pre-integrated automation technologies and low-code tools.
IBM Cloud Pak is the latest deployment option of the IBM automation platform for digital business, available on Red Hat OpenShift.
N/A
Pricing
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Features
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Central monitoring
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logging
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Application integration
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
7.3
Ratings
18% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
6.4
Ratings
23% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation has been exceptionally useful in addressing multi-step processes that need to be streamlined in application building or other processes. It is also efficient when running large amounts of data and contents that require automation with the guarantee of fewer errors. The product also performs organizing and managing tasks well, which makes it easy to find and use specific datasets.
String handling / parsing. I find myself using PowerShell to do a fair amount of text parsing (particularly if manipulations are needed) - not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly a place where ActiveBatch could be improved.
Debugging - or lack of it! With no stepping debugger, it can be a longer process than many other programming / scripting environments: rather than simply stepping through and observing state changes, I find myself inserting logging steps to excess, then having to clean them up once the error is found.
The perennial - Documentation! While a near-universal complaint for *any* software, ActiveBatch's developer documentation is somewhat spotty - just where I need detail, I find summary-level info. There is lots of documentation (as there should be for a tool with such a wide range of applications), but it is in mixed formats (some PDF, some CHM), and the descriptions of specific fields within job steps is often little more than I can get in a tool-tip in the GUI. Allowable ranges, expected formats for string data, and similar helpful details are inconsistent.
The KnowledgeBase at ASCI's web site often has examples which answer the questions I have, but not always - and not always under the search terms one would think to use.
IBM Cloud Pak provides modernization in collecting, organizing and analyzing data. This product provides to unify market leading services such as data management, DataOps, governance, business analytics and automated AI. IBM Cloud Pak is best for resource and infrustructure optimization. IBM Cloud Pak is capable to accomodate our business automation needs.
We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
I selected IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation over Microsoft Power Automate due to its robust integration capabilities, particularly its seamless integration with our existing tools. IBM's solution excels in handling complex workflows and content collaboration across different departments, aligning closely with our operational needs. While Microsoft Power Automate is user-friendly, it was not as well-suited to our specific workflow complexity and integration requirements.
ActiveBatch can automate intricate procedures and minimise manual involvement, which can boost an organization's production and efficiency.
Organisations can save money by using ActiveBatch to automate operations, which lowers the expenses of manual labour and potential mistakes.
Implementing ActiveBatch could come with hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.