ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
ActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Automation allows the user to design, build and run automation applications and services on any cloud, using pre-integrated automation technologies and low-code tools. IBM Cloud Pak is the latest deployment option of the IBM automation platform for digital business, available on Red Hat OpenShift.N/A
Pricing
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Features
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
7.3
Ratings
18% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
6.4
Ratings
23% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
7.5
Ratings
21% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Code-Based Automation00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
No-Code Automation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
Read full review
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation has been exceptionally useful in addressing multi-step processes that need to be streamlined in application building or other processes. It is also efficient when running large amounts of data and contents that require automation with the guarantee of fewer errors. The product also performs organizing and managing tasks well, which makes it easy to find and use specific datasets.
Read full review
Pros
  • Makes scheduling easy to understand, follow, and rerun jobs when necessary.
  • Allows for cross-team coordination of scheduled tasks which reduces errors.
  • Makes stopping jobs easy when needed for server/database downtime.
  • Scripting enables us to easily change email addresses for failed job alerts.
  • Nested plans/jobs make creating and changing dependencies simple.
Read full review
  • I like how this tool provides us with automation capabilities to all our business processes hence improves our productivity.
  • Helps us to analyze complex workflows for our clients.
  • Accelerate our growth to digital transformation.
  • Reduce clients wait time. Hence we are able to deliver on time.
Read full review
Cons
  • String handling / parsing. I find myself using PowerShell to do a fair amount of text parsing (particularly if manipulations are needed) - not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly a place where ActiveBatch could be improved.
  • Debugging - or lack of it! With no stepping debugger, it can be a longer process than many other programming / scripting environments: rather than simply stepping through and observing state changes, I find myself inserting logging steps to excess, then having to clean them up once the error is found.
  • The perennial - Documentation! While a near-universal complaint for *any* software, ActiveBatch's developer documentation is somewhat spotty - just where I need detail, I find summary-level info. There is lots of documentation (as there should be for a tool with such a wide range of applications), but it is in mixed formats (some PDF, some CHM), and the descriptions of specific fields within job steps is often little more than I can get in a tool-tip in the GUI. Allowable ranges, expected formats for string data, and similar helpful details are inconsistent.
  • The KnowledgeBase at ASCI's web site often has examples which answer the questions I have, but not always - and not always under the search terms one would think to use.
Read full review
  • For heavy load, the performance should be improved
  • The integration with the messaging system is a bit tricky and hence example documentation could be provided
  • It is a very nice and powerful tool however still not very known, marketing needs to be improved
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
IBM Cloud Pak provides modernization in collecting, organizing and analyzing data. This product provides to unify market leading services such as data management, DataOps, governance, business analytics and automated AI. IBM Cloud Pak is best for resource and infrustructure optimization. IBM Cloud Pak is capable to accomodate our business automation needs.
Read full review
Usability
We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
Read full review
I selected IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation over Microsoft Power Automate due to its robust integration capabilities, particularly its seamless integration with our existing tools. IBM's solution excels in handling complex workflows and content collaboration across different departments, aligning closely with our operational needs. While Microsoft Power Automate is user-friendly, it was not as well-suited to our specific workflow complexity and integration requirements.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ActiveBatch can automate intricate procedures and minimise manual involvement, which can boost an organization's production and efficiency.
  • Organisations can save money by using ActiveBatch to automate operations, which lowers the expenses of manual labour and potential mistakes.
  • Implementing ActiveBatch could come with hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.
Read full review
  • A platform with multiple functions, automations and system monitoring.
  • The components of this software help to obtain results from the first month of its implementation.
  • Each module has a price and can be purchased according to the direct need of the company; this helps to adapt to our budget.
Read full review
ScreenShots