Accounting Seed is accounting software that is native to Salesforce.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
Accounting Seed
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Accounting Seed
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing starts at $3,960/year.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Accounting Seed
Infor VISUAL
Features
Accounting Seed
Infor VISUAL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.7
Ratings
24% above category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
9.70 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Plug-ins
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Dashboards
9.70 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.70 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.80 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
8.9
Ratings
13% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
9.60 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cash management
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
7.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.70 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking
9.70 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Location management
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
9.4
Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
Ratings
21% above category average
Pricing
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order entry
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Credit card processing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
8.6
Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Project Costing
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.2
Ratings
79% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Accounting Seed is a great solution for businesses looking for reliable accounting software. It offers all the features needed and works as expected. In addition, it is not as pricey as many competitors and therefore a great choice. I would recommend it for both startups and established businesses.
The original version of Visual Manufacturing (Lilly Software) was intended for mechanical manufacturing. It was adapted at our facility (we were not the first) to accomodate electronic manufacturing. For electronic manufacturing process control it is not ideal when referencing in-line or custom processes used to build product. For material control it is excellent unless a modification to a standard product is required (and we did this on 60% of product going out the door). The co-product feature that removes material from an assembly requires the creator of the work order to calculate the percentage of cost the removed items are from the completed product. On the business operations side regional tax reports were difficult to extract and an external module to go into the data base and extract that had to be created. The system itself was stable for the most part. Occasional "data collisions" corrupted transactions at times. The accounting procedures in place found them by the end of the month .where they were corrected. For a small business with less formal processes Infor Visual can be used with little training for the operators. If the processes need a higher level of accountability and control the processes can be formalized with workflow scripts to ensure that higher level of control.
Sometimes when creating a receipt it can't seem to find the company I am searching for in the drop-down, I have to go out to the company and enter from there.
Some of the accounting reports seem to be limited, though at times this may just be the user! Still learning as I go! But there have been some reports that state I would need to add another partner app to do, which would mean more cost.
At times a "shadow part" is necessary in the manufacturing process. This shadow part does not require an inventory transaction but is made a as a separate process - sometimes out of sequence to the general process flow. Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 does not have that capability.
When generating forms for business and manufacturing operations Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 has a limited number of options. To change or add forms requires an unsupported editor. When the stock and custom options are depleted an outside programming module is required as well as programmers to develop the forms.
While free software upgrades to the main operations modules have been part of the maintenance agreement. One upgrade required database and hardware support not justifiable for the current business model. The system was frozen at the current version at that time.
There is no easy way to differentiate between engineering documentation and production documentation.
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Accounting Seed was easy to implement and use without third-party service providers' intervention. Furthermore, the vendor forwarded us a copy of articles and documentation on implementation, customization and integration, which made it much easier for us to integrate it with company API and other external programs.
We seldom have had to use their support but when we have, they have been responsive and actually were able to answer our questions in a simple, nontech language. You don't have to be a programmer to talk to them!
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
I have never used Xero at my current organization, but I used it at Alliance Data before Implementing Accounting Seed. Xero wasn’t updated much during the years that we were using it. Also, Xero failed to integrate with some of third-party applications that we were using. Finally, Accounting Seed was highly navigable, had clean UI/UX unlike Xero.
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.