Portainer - powerful multiplatform Docker config and management, highly recommended
Overall Satisfaction with Portainer
I use Docker for a number of small web sites for personal and client use; typically based on grav flat file CMS. These containers are deployed on cloud hosted infrastructure on physical servers and on NAS.As
a recent convert to Docker (from virtual machines) container sprawl is a
challenge, especially using nginx proxy and pihole/filtering DNS.
I registered with Portainer for test use with a personal address jzedward@hotmail.com
The 5 device 'test' license is full featured
a recent convert to Docker (from virtual machines) container sprawl is a
challenge, especially using nginx proxy and pihole/filtering DNS.
I registered with Portainer for test use with a personal address jzedward@hotmail.com
The 5 device 'test' license is full featured
Pros
- single point of management for multiple hosts
- access to management UI from diverse hosts
- ease of installation and use
- 5 device test licence
Cons
- license management and assignment pretty clunky
- docker compose yml management not intuitive
- single point of management
- ease of use
- no specific metrics available
- Docker
I was using shell scripting and yml to manage deployments
I have also tried Docker Desktop but found it clumsy and annoying
Portainer was cross platform and easy to access from multiple devices
I will continue to use some shell scripts for management as I am a *nix kind of guy.
I have also tried Docker Desktop but found it clumsy and annoying
Portainer was cross platform and easy to access from multiple devices
I will continue to use some shell scripts for management as I am a *nix kind of guy.
Do you think Portainer delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Portainer's feature set?
Yes
Did Portainer live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Portainer go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Portainer again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation