Item: Miro
Rating: 6
Author: Amerigo Borghi

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

- Create processes and have collaborative comments/updates - Mind-mapping - Brainstorming

Pros and Cons

Pros

Have space for long brainstorming
Is collaborative and live (I.e. no version control)
Easy to learn but difficult to master

Cons

Learning materials/best cases examples
Integration with excel or ppt - for example converting ppt slides into boards with objects

Return on Investment

No, to be honest, we just use it for brainstorming and can be easily replaced by less say a normal ppt slide (for our use case)

Implementation Rating

There is a bit of a learning curve and haven’t found the materials on it fully supportive.

Ease of Integration

Here is where there is a lot of room for improvement, especially with the Microsoft Office suite

Collaboration

We used it but just marginally because the teams weren’t super well versed on it

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?

Alternatives Considered

Trello

I haven’t selected it, it was just provided.

Miro is well suited for collaborative brainstorming and projects which requires creativity and flexibility in the ideation but also process management phase. It is less appropriate for presentation making I.e. reporting, for example, would be nice to convert xls into boards

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Miro: Good for brainstorming and visualising processing not so good for integration with Microsoft office suite