Visual Collaboration
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro works incredibly well for displaying architectural presentations and meeting with professors or other students. This software is essential as architecture is an incredibly visual field and it allows for creators and architects alike to present their work in a fashion that feels natural and fluid, almost as though it is being done In person.
Pros
- Collaboration.
- Document assembly.
- Presentation.
Cons
- Having a universal import size for all documents to avoid overly large documents from overtaking the entire page.
- Adding more fonts and creative opportunities.
- Many documents will go blank on more populated pages.
- Improved productivity.
- Improved collaboration.
- Improved morale.
It has made remote connections seamless between our professors and students. Architecture is a creative profession that needs a visual connection and Miro supplies an exceptional remote workspace when it comes to connecting pen to paper and person to person.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- Zoom and Discord
Although Miro lacks auditory communication it makes up for it in its ability to visually demonstrate information and allow for other means of communication such as notes and comments.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation