Jama Connect experience
February 13, 2025
Jama Connect experience
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Jama Connect
we adopt in SW automotive domain to manage projects that must be regulated for ASPICE, ISO26262 and ISO21434. Main scope is to converge in the usage on a single tool and benefit in having all the traceability in live mode, documentation, requirements and Tests specifications. the target is to adopt the same approach for every project and for differents teams so in case of collaboration we can easily converge.
Pros
- requirements collection and organization
- traceability live view
- user friendly interface
Cons
- improve the graphical traceability
- simplify the integration to other tools (planview is a contrainth)
- high license fee + extra cost for integration or for features like AI assistant
- the cost is quite expensive thta's why it is mainly adopted by company needing to meet compliancy to standards. Non regulated SW will choose cheaper tools ( ex JIRA)
- there is a significant initial learning curve to become familiar with it and define and customize the processes. After that it becomes easier.
in terms of features they were similar. The difference was due on the architecture of Jama Connect which apperas more simple and effcient. Polarion was relying to an SVN database.
Do you think Jama Connect delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Jama Connect's feature set?
Yes
Did Jama Connect live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Jama Connect go as expected?
No
Would you buy Jama Connect again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation