Cisco ISR 4K- Flexible, Feature-rich
June 25, 2018
Cisco ISR 4K- Flexible, Feature-rich

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Routers
We use ISR4K exclusively for corporate and branch offices operating at 1Gbps or less on the wide area network. They are extremely effective WAN routers coming in very useful [for] typical form factors depending on HA and the number of interface requirements. Typical use case is for ethernet circuits less than 1Gbps or TDM such as T1. Secondary use case is voice: E&M, FXO, CME. The high-density analog module gives us a great option for larger analog footprint locations. Tertiary use case is iWAN and foreseeably SD-WAN.
Pros
- Easy to use, simple to operate, highly predictable. IOS/IOS-XE is well known and there is a virtually limitless pool of engineers who know this platform and if not having direct experience, can apply knowledge from other IOS/IOS-XE with very little adjustment.
- Extremely flexible due to wide variety of interfaces. NIM and SM-X provide a great deal options: TDM, E&M, FXO, FXS, switches and servers are all options.
- Robust IP feature set: Routing protocols, NBAR, Netflow, QoS, DMVPN. This large IP feature set gives us the ISR makes it a highly re-usable router, capable in many different use cases.
Cons
- I would like to see an extremely simpler licensing. ISR still suffers from Cisco licensing complexity.
- I would like to see improvements in IOS-XE incorporating some of the capabilities found in IOS-XR e.g., config commits and rollback. This may require an IOS fork but unifying IOS-XR and IOS-XE would be a welcome change.
- I would like to see unified SD-WAN, Voice, and IOS-XE image. I believe this is already on the roadmap.
- Cisco Routers provide us the features we need for central SIP trunking which is a huge cost saving vs. POTS and KSU.
- Reduction in WAN circuit costs are expected with SD-WAN.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation