TrustRadius Insights for WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Comprehensive and Helpful Reports: Many users have found the reports generated by the product to be comprehensive and helpful in identifying and rectifying accessibility issues quickly. The detailed analysis provided by the product's dashboard is praised for its usefulness in making business decisions.
Customizable Settings: Users appreciate the ability to customize settings according to their preferences, such as scanning the entire webpage or specific sections, and choosing to ignore certain types of accessibility issues. This flexibility allows users to tailor the product to their specific needs.
Seamless Integration through API: Users appreciate the seamless integration of accessibility testing into their development process through the API. This feature streamlines workflow and ensures that website accessibility is addressed from an early stage.
We use this for very basic accessibility testing for our websites and applications and is by no means a comprehensive breakdown of the state of accessibility.
Pros
Identifies contrast errors
Identifies skipped headings
locates hidden or empty containers
Cons
It uses pt VS px. Nobody outside of print is using pt
It has some tools and they are incomplete at best
misidentifies inputs as needing labels (like a submit which does not require a label)
Likelihood to Recommend
This is pretty middle of the road. It does a good job of picking out some of the low-hanging fruit, but it's not going properly evaluate semantic structure and will pop several false positives. Additionally, the tools are incomplete. For instance, the contrast editor will allow you to test your colors with sliders so you can get the closest color that passes; however, that isn't how color palettes work, you generally don't get to change a companies palette without a lot of pain; furthermore, there is no ability to adjust the font-size and both font-size AND color are used to determine contrast requirements. Oh, and they use points VS pixels...nobody is using points on the web even if the ADA uses them in their fairly dated guidelines. Text from the actual contrast editor "Text is present that has a contrast ratio less than 4.5:1, or large text (larger than 18 point or 14 point bold) has a contrast ratio less than 3:1.". 14pt = 18.66 pixels, so I can see their logic even if I don't agree with it.
VU
Verified User
Employee in Information Technology (E-Learning company, 1001-5000 employees)
I routinely use the WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool browser extension to check accessibility for web pages and web content. I primarily use it to give vendors a clear and understandable way to see the accessibility errors in their websites as well as in content they want us to embed on our websites. The tool helps us keep our partners meeting at least the bare minimum for accessibility.
Pros
Easy to use
Easy to read and understand
Free to use, leaving even stubborn vendors without a reason to refuse.
Cons
Sometimes the automated functions miss things or are mis-triggered
I would like it to link out to more in-depth reading on issues and resolving them
I would love it if it generated a PDF report to send people.
Likelihood to Recommend
I recommend this tool all the time. It's a great, free way to, at-a-glance, gauge the basic accessibility of a web page. It catches most of the glaring issues and provides an easy way to quickly show a client or vendor where some fundamental issues are and how to resolve them. Given the price, you can't go wrong. It does not replace manual review, or even a more powerful site scanner, but it's a great, quick, foot-in-the-door to explain what accessibility is, why it matters and what some basic issues and fixes are.
VU
Verified User
Director in Marketing (Education Management company, 501-1000 employees)