TestComplete

I used TestComplete for 2 of our products. 1. Ours is a read-only CAD tool, where we used the object mapping technique to create the test cases and it worked well for us except for a few of the exceptions where object mapping failed. 2. It is an add-on for the Creo Parametric, where we recognize the features of the object/CAD model.

• Test Complete worked for us where other automation testing environments failed.
• Good and intuitive UI, a newbie would get comfortable in short period of time.
• Support of scripting languages is a big plus, employees can have a choice of their own to create test scripts.

Eggplant Functional and HCL OneTest

Selenium, Eclipse, PyCharm

We are migrating Manual TestCases to an Automated framework using TestComplete. I am responsible for creating this framework integrating TestComplete with Jenkins and the qTest management tool. Our software is responsible for simulation and is based on C++ with MFC library and for testing. Our main problem with automation is correct create locators and mapping for all of our cases in-app which contains a lot of old code and new approach and [integrating] it with one testing framework

• Automation of our testcases
• Repeatability of tests
• Finally Regression testing
• Speed up testing process

National Instruments TestStand, Python IDLE and National Instruments LabVIEW

Jenkins, Behave, National Instruments TestStand

We use TestComplete on our product known as Omni Accounts. TestComplete helps us in automating the testing process with the mundane repetitive tasks that are required with each release. To manually do these tests, will take a lot of time, and as we know time is money. With TestComplete, this process is automated and it does not take as much effort and time as a manual process. It is a brilliant product and even someone without coding knowledge will be able to create test cases. The test recorder does most of the work for you.

• Return on Investment both in time and money
• Ease of use
• Knowledge gained
• More knowledge of other smartbear products

Apache JMeter and Selenium

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro), Swagger Open Source, supported by SmartBear, SwaggerHub

I used [TestComplete] with ASP software in [the] testing team. It is flexible [and easy to] define our automation framework and scripts according to what we need. I design the test cases based on user scenarios then use TestComplete to execute [and] collect results [that] then generate the reports. It is easy to analyze the issues based on the Testcomplete report.

• Positive: It saves us a lot of time on non-regression test on C/S software application
• Positive: It can provide promptly response when we need technical support
• Negative: It seems not quickly follow up the windows OS migration

Selenium

TestComplete is one of the prominent tools that we use in delivering Software QA Assurance, automating our Functional Tests, Regression Tests & Sanity Tests respectively. As a business, it addresses the complexity of setting up an Automated Test Framework and ensures code quality that supports stability and a positive user experience for Development in tests. We find Test project suites and codes fairly easy to build and maintain and the Test Record & Playback feature ensures we can easily introduce software engineers without prior experience to Test Automation.

• TestComplete has helped in testing round the clock especially during off business hours, thereby saving project delivery time. We find it useful to be able to automate a test, execute and go, be back much later and pick up the results.

Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT)