TrustRadius Insights for StorPool are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Great Look and Feel: Users have consistently praised the attractive and intuitive interface of the StorPool application, contributing to an overall excellent user experience. The visually appealing design and smooth navigation enhance the usability of the platform.
Easy to Use: Reviewers unanimously agree that StorPool is incredibly user-friendly due to its straightforward and intuitive interface. Even users with minimal technical expertise can quickly grasp how to navigate and utilize the various features of the application.
Flexibility in Access: One notable advantage of StorPool is its ability to provide both cloud-based and offline access to stored content. This flexibility allows users to conveniently access their data from anywhere at any time, ensuring seamless availability regardless of network connectivity.
We did 2 hyper-converged setups, connected to a redundant 10Gbit multipath storage network with SSD drives, managed by KVM and OpenNebula. The set-up runs mission-critical workloads and has high-availability and built-in disaster recovery (DR). We now use StorPool as a building block for new clouds .
Pros
We chose StorPool not just because of the better price/performance ratio, but also because StorPool managed to offer us smooth implementation without an impact on our production environment. StorPool’s biggest advantages are the high availability of the system, hardware failure handling, and performance. The OpenNebula integration and ease of operation were also crucial.
Cons
Cons - Support for VMware is with iSCSI at this point. This is fine, but we're waiting for the full VMware integration they are working on.
Likelihood to Recommend
Storpool performs well on block level (and that is what we use it for). It is not yet supporting a kind of distributed filesystem or object storage - a filesystem layer needs to be built on top of it.
We have 12 active locations around the world and a number of new locations in development, which makes our case more complex. We were looking for flexibility in the deployment model, allowing to tailor the storage solution to the specific requirements of every location. StorPool’s storage solution integrated seamlessly with the networking and computing pieces. For instance, in Zurich, our largest cloud, StorPool was deployed in a semi-converged setup which combines converged all-SSD nodes (running both applications and storage) with separate storage-only HDD nodes. In other locations where the power density is lower, the optimal setup is different and in that case is used a fully converged set.
Pros
One of the attractions of StorPool was that it is a very technology-focused company and has highly talented individuals. We are confident, not only that the product was the right product, because of the design and the architectural aspects, but also that the team behind it was very engaged and had the skills and ability to support a service provider. For a cloud provider, the storage is a system which cannot be taken down, even for maintenance, because it’s impossible to coordinate thousands of customers regarding downtime. With StorPool, however, we don’t have to worry about that.
Cons
Graphical interface is for monitoring and stats, but not for operations.