TrustRadius Insights for ReadyAPI are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Swagger Integration: Many users have praised the ability of SoapUI and ReadyApi to read in endpoints for a restful web service via a Swagger page or definitions file. This feature has been described as extremely helpful, with reviewers appreciating the time-saving aspect of not having to figure things out directly or rely on specs to build their requests. Additionally, the ability to easily update endpoints when they change was seen as a valuable feature.
Groovy Functions: Users have found the addition of groovy functions in SoapUI and ReadyApi to be very useful. They appreciate being able to use a programming language with Java libraries, which provides them with much more flexibility in how they process results and build follow-up requests.
Auto-generation of Test Cases: The auto-generation of test cases in SoapUI Pro has received high praise from users. It gives them a good head start on their testing efforts by building a set of tests that cover at least the happy path scenarios. Users also appreciate the visual guide provided by the test case GUI, which helps them structure their suites and scenarios effectively.
When our organization shifted focus to building software in micro-service-style architecture, we needed a good tool to test the APIs. ReadyAPI was a great solution as it makes automation and performance testing very easy. A lot of tools in the market are good for manual testing but not for automated ones.
Pros
It makes API automation seamless, easy, and efficient.
Performance testing, distributing load, and key performance indicators are very well put together to help improve the performance of APIs.
Even non-programmers can quickly ramp up and write efficient automation tests.
Cons
Such a good tool and I love it. There are many open-source tools that do the same and are free.
Adding visuals to show chaining or dependent apis will be helpful.
Adding contract testing feature to the toolset will improve the value immensely.
Likelihood to Recommend
If you have non-programmers and manual testers in the team, ReadyAPI is the best fit for API testing and automation. This will make the testing cycles shorter and improve the quality drastically. On the flip side, if your team has developers and test engineers who can write code, there are many open source solutions out there that can provide more or less all the features.
VU
Verified User
Professional in Quality Assurance (Information Technology and Services company, 10,001+ employees)
I have worked on different API automations like Ready API, Rest Assured, Katalon Studio, Karate etc. And after evaluating different tools we found that ReadyAPI is far superior to other API automation tools. It supports testing for Rest, SOAP, GraphQL, etc. It is a Scriptless API testing tool. Data-driven testing and Security testing are important features of this tool. It also has a feature to measure test coverage. So far Ready API is one of the best API automation tool I have come across in recent times.
Pros
Scriptless
Data driven testing
API Reporting dashboard
Security and Performance testing
Run Test suites in parallel
Property Transfer
Cons
Only supports Groovy script
Licensing cost
Limited options available to generate data using Data source
Likelihood to Recommend
ReadyAPI is one of the best API automation tools. It is a Scriptless tool and requires very less coding expertise while working with groovy scripts in ReadyAPI. It is well suited for testing Rest, SOAP, GraphQL, etc services. Data-driven testing has been made it very easy with various options such as Excel, Database, JSON, etc. Performance testing is also one of the important features of ReadyAPI. It is not suited for Web or Mobile automation. Also not appropriate for mocking the servers
VU
Verified User
Team Lead in Information Technology (Information Technology & Services company, 10,001+ employees)
We currently develop an ERP accounting system that makes use of an API such that third-party systems can integrate with us. Ready API helps us in testing the API from a functional as well as a performance perspective
Pros
Setting up Endpoints
Setting up of assertions to check if endpoints are working correctly
load testing of endpoints
Cons
Ease of use similar to test tools such as test complete
Groovy script completion for users that do not have Groovy knowledge
Easier buildup of endpoints like a built in Swagger Inspector
Likelihood to Recommend
For any application that has any type of API and requires automated testing, Ready API is the ideal solution.
It is critical for API testing. It is not suitable for front end web testing
ReadyAPI enables our team to create, manage and run automated functional, security, and performance tests of RESTful, SOAP, Kafka, and other web services within a centralized interface, driving thus the quality of APIs.
Pros
API
Alerts/Notifications
Productivity analysis
Test management
Data extraction
Cons
VSC doesn't work well
No connector to NoSQL database
Performance
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for test management.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (Information Technology & Services company, 11-50 employees)
In our company, ReadyAPI is mainly used for testing API services.
Our main objective is to test services across many environments, also we need scripts to generate data, etc. That's why we started using ReadyAPI, which has different environment support and is easily changed in one click. ReadyAPI also supports Groovy scripts and WSDL.
ReadyAPI is a great tool to create test steps and their flows also has a nice assertions system.
Pros
Multi Environment Support
Several test cases and its flows management
Scripts support
Complex assertion system
GIT, Jenkins, Docker Support
Cons
Dark Mode
Simple test cases copy paste functionality
Changing several assertions same time
Likelihood to Recommend
I am not able to recall using anything which can be compared to ReadyAPI for API testing. ReadyAPI is a must-have tool for mid/large organizations to test their API services across all envs. ReadyAPI is well suited to test all kinds of API types.
The disadvantage of ReadyAPI is that sometimes it's not stable and it crashes and if your changes are not saved, it's all lost. I would love to see a recovery feature added to it. Also, it doesn't have dark mode support which really strains my eyes.
This tool is being used by developers and integrators to develop and test the various kinds of web services available within the IT system that we develop. It is also used to train on the various web services available and provide meaningful examples. The tool is also used to perform regression testing.
Pros
Ability to use test data from previous requests
Quick and easy to discover and connect to service endpoints
Cons
When using Forms within a Test Step, doesn't also keep the values entered
Likelihood to Recommend
[Well suited] as a training tool to discuss with integrators using our web services.
VU
Verified User
Project Manager in Information Technology (Information Technology & Services company, 11-50 employees)
We were looking for an option for creating our regression suite and ReadyAPI came as a solution for it, our application being API heavy application. This application is being used across multiple projects for building Regression/Functional Testing suite and load testing as well.
Pros
Easy to use.
Reporting.
Creation of test cases.
Adding validation.
Execution.
Execution on multiple environments with less/no changes.
Cons
More helpful documents.
Use of multiple scripting language (adding code ) for validation.
Performance when steps or projects grows in a workspace.
Likelihood to Recommend
1. GUI automation is not possible. 2. Performance degrades, when steps grows or multiple projects are added in a workspace. 3. Version support, in case someone is using older version, the application stops proper execution. A pop up should be shown with the changes in newer version. 4. Also, updating version sometimes removes our prior many changes. 5. Sometimes even though we save steps etc., the same is not saved and need to redo it.
VU
Verified User
Professional in Information Technology (Information Technology & Services company, 10,001+ employees)
ReadyAPI is used for the quality department to bring efficiency on the API test. We use the tool to automated all the API that the company has, doing the process easy and fast. We do regression test with just a click, saving time, give us the option to handle more that one API in less time.
Pros
Easy to learn.
Friendly user experience.
A lot of documentation.
Likelihood to Recommend
We use ReadyAPI mainly for the regression test, really easy to check all the endpoints that you need in less time. Also is really easy add new endpoint. Also, we check one a week all the API that we has with just one click, providing the errors with good response and efficiency.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (Marketing & Advertising company, 501-1000 employees)
Used on several accounts and users. Many use the free version but we have quite a bit of us who use the Pro version. Used for automating functional testing.
Pros
Functional test automation
WYSIWYG interface for data driven testing
Matured product
Can extend functionality with scripting
Cons
Need phone support
More examples of groovy script for advanced users
Decrease load time
Ability to connect to Google Sheets as data source/data sink
Likelihood to Recommend
Anyone can start with free version. Pro version is well suited [for] automating functional testing and data driven testing and doesn't require scripting knowledge for simple cases. LoadUI Pro is good for load testing but is quite expensive when [there are a] lot of free options are available.
VU
Verified User
Professional in Information Technology (Information Technology & Services company, 1001-5000 employees)