Selenium review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
With Selenium, we used both UI and backend Rest services automation. Which is drastically spent on resources rather than automation tools. With Selenium, both frameworks are good and easy to approach and maintain. All test data and link the Jira user story dynamically passed through CI/CD pipeline and updated test case status directly in Jira. Which is an awesome framework built using Selenium and I recommend this to use all other projects.
Pros
- Easily maintain all types of testing with tags.
- Integration with CI/CD pipeline.
- Parallel test preparation while story is in dev progress.
- Easy to integrate with other tools such as Jenkins and team city.
Cons
- Little hard to compare image testing with images.
- It should have a standalone IDE for business users/nontechnical users to do the automation.
- It should have record and playback feature.
- It should support all kind of applications (SAP and Mainframe).
Most Important Features
- CI/CD.
- Open source.
- Framework at POM.
Return on Investment
- Less cost on Selenium.
- Coverage for all web application across organization.
- Need an UI for non-technical users.
Alternatives Considered
Worksoft Connective Automation Platform and Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT)
Other Software Used
Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT), Worksoft Connective Automation Platform, Tricentis Tosca




