TrustRadius Insights for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Efficiency, Scalability, and Versatility Appreciation: Reviewers have consistently praised Red Hat Enterprise Linux - RHEL for its efficiency in operations, scalability to meet varying demands, and versatile nature demonstrated through seamless integration with middleware components like JBoss.
Reliability and Security Acknowledgment: Users value the reliability of RHEL, emphasizing its consistent performance track record and high level of security maintained over time. They appreciate the presence of built-in security measures, regular updates, and compatibility with tools such as Ansible for easy deployment.
Excellent Support Recognition: Many users have highlighted the outstanding support provided by Red Hat without specifying individual names or personally identifying information. They mention the support team's helpfulness and responsiveness via chat or email channels.
RHEL does a lot things well depending on how it is configured. So I would say RHEL excels at being flexible.
RHEL is a very stable operating system and is easy to maintain when properly configured and used.
RHEL is a secure OS when all the proper configurations are in place.
Cons
I have had issues with RHEL corrupting when being patched online and then the OS loses network connectivity.
SELinux with MLS does not have much documentation and is a pain to get working.
Likelihood to Recommend
RHEL can be a great production server when configured properly, it is very flexible and can be used in many different scenarios whether it be a web server, file server, database server, or a load balancer. RHEL is less appropriate in end user environment where the use needs to do daily office work tasks although it still can be done.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is the core OS for our software development environment. It gives a secure and stable foundation for building and deploying applications.
Pros
Performance optimization of system workloads
Stable and predictable environment
Hardened security features like SELinux, FIPS, FAPolicy
Cons
More support for offline (air gapped) environments
Likelihood to Recommend
It's ideal for software development in secure environments, mission critical apps or even just end user desktop use
Configuration management isn't always difficult depending on what it is.
Account creations are definitely easy
File management
Cons
If there was possibly, I think there's a GUI, but I'm not sure. But the FA policy service probably needs a GUI. Easier incorporation between R seven and RL eight products.
Likelihood to Recommend
The installation of certain applications is pretty easy, especially with the DNF and YAML repositories.
Our RHEL environment powers our Ansible environment. We have several top tier applications that run on RHEL. OpenShift run zone, a core RHEL for bare metal nodes, so it does a lot.
Pros
It's solid. You don't have a whole lot of viruses. You don't have to worry about viruses like the Windows products and it works every time. It does what it's told to do, it's very lightweight. I heard it's getting even more lightweight and can't wait for that. So solid product.
Cons
In the LEAP process. The upgrading process, which I'm hearing, like I said it before, prior that I was on rail seven, eight, and nine. Trying to get all of that to rail nine and stay current. The LEAP process from seven to eight is a little bit less than desired. I've talked to some people that from once you get on eight from eight to nine to nine to 10 is a breeze. So I'm looking forward to that.
Likelihood to Recommend
It's probably less appropriate for databases. I don't know anybody else's doing a lot of databases to have databases on with RHEL, but everything else it does well from applications to now AI with AI models does it all in my opinion.
We need a stable OS to support our various applications that produce our satellite internet service.
Pros
Stability and reliability
Performance and scalability
Enterprise support
Cons
High subscription cost
Time to adopt latest packages
Dependency on red hat ecosystem
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is great to use to provide a stable OS to build enterprise software. It is reliable, easy to pick up, and you get support.
Used for running enterprise applications we require high availability scalability and long term support, web services, databases for main business purposes.
Problems the complexity of initial setup for new users, subscription entitlements and some compatibility issues with third-party software.
Pros
Enterprise grade stability and security
System management tool
Strong container an cloud integration
Cons
Subscription and licensing complexity
Steep learning curve for beginners
Limited support for some third-party software
Likelihood to Recommend
Good for Enterprise data centers Regulated industries Hybrid cloud and container environments Less appropriate for Small business with limited budget Casual or desktop use Rapid prototyping or experimental projects
VU
Verified User
Manager in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)
We have server applications that are running on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) environment, and this environment is very well supported, secured, and helps in easy deployment and testing of client applications.
Pros
Provides fast performance and helps in maintaining safety.
Server deployment experience is just pleasant as compare to other Linux environment.
Their support team is very professional and knowledgeable.
Cons
Complexity of product due to CMD dependency.
Mulitple update issues encountered everytime.
Likelihood to Recommend
I think that Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is extremely helpful ease to install , manage OS environment with stable application performance and good for critical testing and data managment.