The best service for reducing AWS computing costs
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
ProsperOps simply requires the least privileged level of access, which provides us peace of mind and dependability. Passive monitoring of our computing resources does not necessitate the use of any agents, and the cost analysis is handled by a simple IAM role. Because of this, we don't have to worry about ProsperOps' access privileges impacting our application's performance or posing a security risk.
Pros
- The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
- It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
- It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Cons
- The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
- When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Most Important Features
- The process of setting up AWS was simple.
- In fact, they are professionals in the field of infrastructure cost-saving.
- ProsperOps has saved me a tremendous amount of time by allowing me to optimize our computing resources.
Return on Investment
- Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
- Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
- As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Alternatives Considered
CloudKeeper
Other Software Used
Amazon CloudFront, Accenture Cloud Platform, AWS Backup
