Sitefinity - flexibility and affordability in the same package
Pros
- Progress Sitefinity's user-friendly interface allows us to extend use of the platform to wide range of users across the business.
- Constant feature updates continue to add valuable new features and resolve prior issues. This is one of our primary reasons for retaining Progress Sitefinity.
- The Module Builder tool has given us enormous flexibility in enabling us to add new dynamic content items to our Progress Sitefinity platform and support a wide range of business requirements (e.g. course listings, custom news articles, scholarships, etc).
Cons
- Image management.
- It is still not possible to accurately determine whether a image is in active use on the website or not (i.e. embedded on a page/widget). This makes it extraordinarily hard to properly audit our image libraries, which continue to grow and increase our hosting costs. This is without a doubt our number one issue with the platform.
- Requirement to deploy/restart application for many updates.
- While acknowledging that Progress Sitefinity uses best practice when it comes to further development of the platform, the need to deploy new code and/or restart the platform continues to be an inconvenience when managing a production website.
- Lack of granular permissions on site sync and multisite.
- Site sync and multisite are two of Progress Sitefinity's most valuable features in terms of managing our website environment. However, there is no out-of-the-box method currently for assigning a user role to a specific site (a custom role has to be created). Similarly, it is not possible to assign granular permissions to the site sync tool (a user who has access to Site Sync has access to sync all content on all sites). Having more control over these features would reduce the overhead for our site admins.
- The license model in respect of subdomains (whereby an entirely new, full-cost license is required for each subdomain) is relatively uncompetitive and severely limits options when creating a network of sites.
Return on Investment
- Progress Sitefinity's ease of use, particularly when it comes to development, has enabled us to make considerable savings on potential agency costs by transferring the bulk of our website development in-house.
- In addition, Progress Sitefinity's flexibility and range of features has allowed us to respond quickly to business demands and reduce our time to market for new content and features.
- Use of best practice deployment methods allows us better control over associated hosting costs for the platform.
Alternatives Considered
Squiz Matrix, Kentico Kontent, Sitecore Experience Platform and TERMINALFOUR
Other Software Used
Azure App Service, Adobe Analytics, Bitbucket, Google Analytics









