TrustRadius Insights for Paligo are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Content Reuse Capabilities: Users have praised the platform for its robust content reuse capabilities, enabling them to efficiently repurpose and recycle content across multiple projects, saving time and effort in the process. For instance, users can easily leverage existing content to create new materials without starting from scratch.
User-Friendly Interface: Reviewers laud the platform's user-friendly interface, noting how it simplifies tasks such as filtering and managing taxonomies, resulting in a smoother workflow and improved productivity. The intuitive design allows users to navigate seamlessly through different functions and features.
Excellent Customer Support: Customers highly appreciate the excellent customer support offered by the platform, emphasizing that responsive assistance is consistently provided for various content-related needs, contributing significantly to their overall satisfaction. Whether troubleshooting technical issues or seeking guidance on optimizing content strategies, users value the prompt and knowledgeable support team's help.
Loading Reviews List....
Paligo Reviews
2 Reviews
Engineering
Search is temporarily unavailable. Filters are still applied.
We use Paligo to manage all our user documentation. This consists of thousands of topics in hundreds of publications covering hardware, software, and system setup and usage. One of our biggest challenges in managing this much content is that we have very few writers and a number of variations of each of our products. There are seven different variations of our flagship software product, and the manual is over 800 pages. Much of the content is reused across variations, of course. The ability to maintain them all as a single publication and automatically generate the correct set of topics at publishing time is invaluable. We have used XML to make this possible for a number of years, but Paligo gives us all the benefits of XML with few of the drawbacks. It's much easier to use and more reliable than our previous methods for authoring and managing content. This saves us time and lets us focus on the important work.
Pros
Simple and intelligent content reuse
Easy review, feedback, and release workflow
Many publishing options
Intuitive user interface
Cons
Importing unstructured content can be finicky.
The formatting options for PDFs aren't open-ended, but limited to the options that have been made available.
Only users with paid licenses can edit content.
Likelihood to Recommend
Paligo made all my tech writerly dreams come true. It's perfect for companies with people in a traditional technical writer role who write or at least gatekeep all the content. They can collaborate with the subject matter experts within Paligo to get feedback, but the writers manage and publish everything. It's especially useful where content is reused in many different places. It's also great for content that is translated into multiple languages. It would be less amazing for simple or straightforward documents, and it's not a wiki where anyone can edit the content.
We use Paligo in the Technical Documentation department to structure and publish the software guides. We use the Salesforce integration to push the content to Support and the HTML5 publication capacity to publish directly to internal access. The ability to cross-reference and reuse content allows our technical writers to be succinct in topics while still presenting useful information across multiple products with a consistent message throughout.
Pros
The topic/publication structure is quite graceful. It makes setting up an outline of content quite intuitive, and after the tools are identified and defined, it's much simpler to set up a large document and work with others to produce it.
Strict field definitions and use cases make topic structuring inherent in the workflow, which brings more attention to content handling. The train of thought required to utilize the tool also improves the train of thought required to focus the content, making for a better ultimate publication.
The output capabilities and Salesforce integration make publishing the files very easy.
Cons
The learning curve is a bit steep, especially for anyone who's never worked in a true content authoring tool before. It takes a bit of work to move from a Word atmosphere to Paligo, but the training sessions address all of those issues and more.
I wish there were more focused formatting tools. At this point, I don't know how to change the text color or format my output beyond the legacy defaults I inherited when I started this job. My fellow writers and I still sometimes struggle with putting things where we want them to go simply because they aren't the right field type at that location.
Likelihood to Recommend
Before I took the intermediate training, I was so frustrated with Paligo that I mentioned it negatively in a networking event. Now that I have taken the training, I will be correcting that comment at the next one. :) However, part of what I inherited was a badly managed library, and I am working hard with my fellow writers to restructure and re-present the content. I have only been working with Paligo for a month and a half, and while it's been a struggle to get here, I'm glad I learned it so that I can truly utilize its content reuse strengths across three different product lines. It probably would not be ideal for desktop layout or on-demand production environments.
