TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Monster.com

Score8.6 out of 10

105 Reviews and Ratings

What is Monster.com?

Monster in Weston offers their job board for finding the right candidates, boasting resume analysis and role fit scoring, available at Monster.com.

Categories & Use Cases

Top Performing Features

  • Passive Recruitment Advertising

    The ability to post or promote recruitment efforts or specific jobs on social media or other sites

    Category average: 7.1

  • Active Recruitment Advertising

    The ability to promote jobs directly to candidates by email, text, or direct messages

    Category average: 7.8

  • Employer Branding Tools

    The ability to create an employer persona to better engage with candidates and applicants

    Category average: 8

Areas for Improvement

Performance Usability and Value Monster.com

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use Monster.com portal for Sourcing the candidate profile for my business needs. While other portals are too costly, Monster.com provides us a valuable and cost effective services. I always prefer to use Monster.com for my non-It and IT requirements. It provides me an good number of search results. It will be definitely TAT.

Pros

  • Rating of the profile
  • Accurate Searching
  • Location fetching
  • Power Search

Cons

  • Need improvement in visa filtering

Return on Investment

  • Very cost effective
  • Higher profile views
  • Better candidate match according to our search results

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Dice.com, CareerBuilder Applicant Tracking and Prohire

Other Software Used

Dice.com, Prohire, LinkedIn Recruiter

One great platform has steadily declined.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As a job posting site and resume database that assists in filling vacancies, Monster helps us quickly post job postings on the Internet and fill our vacancies quickly. However, the scope of use and effectiveness of Monster have steadily declined in the years since it was acquired by a staffing firm.

Pros

  • Publish posting.
  • Search engine.
  • Interface

Cons

  • Resume database.
  • Reach
  • Marketing

Return on Investment

  • Promoting our brand.
  • Filling vacancies.
  • Reducing cost of hire.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Indeed Ads (Sponsored Jobs) and LinkedIn Jobs

Other Software Used

Indeed Resume, LinkedIn Recruiter, Glassdoor.com

Monster.com: When talent is prioritized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use Monster.com for Candidate sourcing at my current organization. Monster.com helps to quickly identify candidates who meet specific qualifications which reduces time spending on reviewing the profiles. Also, Monster.com has the best filtering options which makes it more helpful for employers to filter out the best resources.

Pros

  • Monster.com is the best to find the talented resources. For an instance a company is looking for a software engineer, Monster.com can access resumes qualified candidates with diverse backgrounds and skill sets.
  • Monster.com has the best filter options that help employers to fetch the best resources.
  • Monster.com excels in offering user-friendly recruitment platform that fulfill to the needs of employers in attracting, screening, and hiring top talent.

Cons

  • Monster.com can integrate with other ATS (Applicant tracking systems) which help organizations with advanced HR Systems.
  • Monster.com can add some filters like salary range an employer is looking for a particular job which candidate has already mentioned while uploading profile on Monster.com.
  • Monster.com can reduce some pricing in some of its premium plans.

Return on Investment

  • Monster.com helped me to close the niche positions and diverse positions very quickly which in return made a huge impact on profit for organization and myself as well.
  • Monster.com helps me reduce the time to fulfill a particular position which again helps to increase the cost.
  • Monster.com has helped me to reach across various demographic groups allowing my company to tap into a more diverse talent pool.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Dice.com

Other Software Used

Dice.com

Monster.com is Tough to Beat

Pros

  • Monster makes it easy for us to post jobs on their platform.
  • Working with Monster does an excellent job of providing alerts when applicants submit for open positions.
  • Our applications that we get from Monster applicants are easy for us to segment out for faster sorting and selections.

Cons

  • It would be nice if Monster could autofill resumes from applicants from information they provide once.
  • Applicants complain about having to fill in all of the fields for their applications - even though they have submitted their resumes.
  • As an applicant, it would be nice to have greater transparency and updates for when a submitted application is shared, opened, or reviewed. Otherwise there can be a sense of being "ghosted" after having applied and not hearing back.

Return on Investment

  • Using Monster.com gives us a sense of confidence in a time-tested platform.
  • We know that using Monster.com will be a better use of our time and resources.
  • By knowing we are working with a jobs posting partner like Monster.com we know that we will get to the positive, timely, qualified applicants we're looking for.
  • Time is money and Monster.com helps us save a lot of both.

Alternatives Considered

Indeed.com and LinkedIn Jobs

Other Software Used

Indeed.com, LinkedIn Jobs, Glassdoor.com, CareerBuilder.com

Monster: Jack of all Trades.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I am a recruiter in a staffing company, fetching profiles according to clients' requirements. Monster.com helps the recruiter and the organization to find qualified candidates according to their business needs. Monster.com has many candidates for every location and different skill sets. Monster.com also provides job posting features and resume filtering, reducing the turnaround time. The scope of my use case is Monster.com job posting and sourcing candidates itself complete the entire cycle of recruitment, which helps me to attract the candidate from the job posting, and if they are not aware of the job posting, we can use the ATS or sourcing tool to reach them if they are fit for the role.

Pros

  • Job Posting.
  • Sourcing Profile through Database.
  • ATS (Application Tracking System).

Cons

  • Filtering
  • Integration with other ATS.
  • Pricing

Return on Investment

  • Turn around Time.
  • Candidate Quality.
  • large Volume hiring.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Dice.com, Indeed.com, Naukri.com and LinkedIn Talent Hub

Other Software Used

Dice.com, LinkedIn Jobs, ZipRecruiter